A Comparison of Bidirectional Glenn vs. Hemi-Fontan Procedure: An Analysis of the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial
- PDF / 445,170 Bytes
- 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 86 Downloads / 176 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A Comparison of Bidirectional Glenn vs. Hemi‑Fontan Procedure: An Analysis of the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Use Dataset Jonathan B. Edelson1 · Chitra Ravishankar1 · Heather Griffis2 · Xuemei Zhang2 · Jennifer Faerber2 · Monique M. Gardner1,3 · Maryam Y. Naim1,3 · Christopher E. Macsio4 · Andrew C. Glatz1,5 · David J. Goldberg1 Received: 18 February 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Patients with single ventricle (SV) heart defects have two primary surgical options for superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC): bidirectional Glenn (BDG) and hemi-Fontan (HF). Outcomes based on type of SCPC have not been assessed in a multi-center cohort. This retrospective cohort study uses the Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) Trial public use dataset. Infants who survived to SCPC were evaluated through 1 year of age, based on type of SCPC. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival at 1 year. The cohort included 343 patients undergoing SCPC across 15 centers in North America; 250 (73%) underwent the BDG. There was no difference between the groups in pre-SCPC clinical characteristics. Cardiopulmonary bypass times were longer [99 min (IQR 76, 126) vs 81 min (IQR 59, 116), p
Data Loading...
