Alternatives to Imprisonment in England and Wales, Germany and Turkey
The book focuses on one of the most problematic areas of Turkish penal justice: the overreliance on custodial measures and a corresponding growth in the prison population, and compares Turkey with two major European countries in this respect: England
- PDF / 2,711,986 Bytes
- 295 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 20 Downloads / 237 Views
.
¨ znur Sevdiren O
Alternatives to Imprisonment in England and Wales, Germany and Turkey A Comparative Study
¨ znur Sevdiren Dr. O [email protected]
ISBN 978-3-642-17350-9 e-ISBN 978-3-642-17351-6 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17351-6 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922990 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMX Design GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)
To my family
.
Acknowledgements
This study simply would not be possible without support and contribution of many people and institutions. I am deeply indebted to my supervisor, Professor Thomas Weigend, for his guidance, perceptive criticism and invariable support. My thanks are also due to my second examiner, Professor Michael Walter, for his critical comments on my study. I should like to take this opportunity also to express my gratitude to numerous former and present members of the Institute of Foreign and International Criminal Law at the University of Cologne, in particular, to Michaela Noack. I would like to extend my gratitude to DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service), University of Cologne and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. The Friedrich-EbertStiftung did not only provide financial assistance between January 2007 and Mai 2010, but also contributed a great deal to the publication of this book. My special thanks go to Josef Minzenbach. Thanks are also due to (PD.) Dr. Andreas Funke, a former holder of FES scholarship, for acting as an advisor during my doctorate at the University of Cologne. Finally, as ever, I owe my deepest gratitude to my parents, Makbule and Ali; my ¨ zgu¨r and Inan for their incredible ¨ lku¨; and my brothers, O sisters, Sevtap and U support and loving encouragement in the long years of researching and writing in London, Sheffield, Istanbul and Cologne. With my deepest love and gratitude, I dedicate this book to them.
vii
.
Contents
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Data Loading...
