Analyzing the Practical Relevance of the Condorcet Loser Paradox and the Agenda Contraction Paradox
A large part of the social choice literature studies voting paradoxes in which seemingly mild properties are violated by common voting rules. In this chapter, we investigate the likelihood of the Condorcet Loser Paradox (CLP) and the Agenda Contraction Pa
- PDF / 10,318,629 Bytes
- 412 Pages / 453.543 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 45 Downloads / 239 Views
Mostapha Diss Vincent Merlin Editors
Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models Essays by and in Honor of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley
Studies in Choice and Welfare Editors-in-Chief Marc Fleurbaey, Paris School of Economics, Paris, France Maurice Salles, University of Caen, Caen, France Series Editors Bhaskar Dutta, Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Wulf Gaertner, FB Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Niedersachsen, Germany Carmen Herrero Blanco, Faculty Economics and Business, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain Bettina Klaus, Faculty of Business & Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Prasanta K. Pattanaik, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA William Thomson, Department of Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6869
Mostapha Diss Vincent Merlin •
Editors
Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models Essays by and in Honor of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley
123
Editors Mostapha Diss Department of Economics CRESE EA3190, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté Besançon, France
Vincent Merlin Faculty of Economics, Management, and Geography CNRS and Université de Caen Normandie Caen, France
ISSN 1614-0311 ISSN 2197-8530 (electronic) Studies in Choice and Welfare ISBN 978-3-030-48597-9 ISBN 978-3-030-48598-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Foreword
The history of social choice theory is mainly a history of negative results. The rebirth of this theory in modern times is essentially due to
Data Loading...
