Author reply
- PDF / 668,230 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 612.283 x 810.709 pts Page_size
- 96 Downloads / 182 Views
Correspondence The concepts of assent and parental permission in pediatrics
T
Urh Groselj Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children’s Hospital Ljubljana, and National Medical Ethics Committee of Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia Email: [email protected]
1 Narchi H, Ghatasheh G, Hassani NA, Reyami LA, Khan Q. Comparison of underlying factors behind parental refusal or consent for lumbar puncture. World J Pediatr 2013;9:336-341. 2 American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;95:314-317. 3 Wendler DS. Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations. J Med Ethics 2006;32:229-234. 4 De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R; Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 2003;162:629633. doi: 10.1007/s12519-014-0460-6
W
e thank Dr. Groselj for his interest in our article and his comments. Although we always provided full information before obtaining parental consent for the intervention, he raised the issue of child's assent and parental permission.[1] He suggested that only the patients with appropriate decisional capacity could give their informed consent; in all other situations, parents should provide informed permission for an intervention on their child, with the child's assent, if appropriate The child, however, has a right to refuse interventions that are not necessary to save his/her life or prevent serious harm.[2] The implication is that the child's assent, assuming its appropriateness can be easily assessed, should overide the parents' decision, if it can clearly be established that they lack the appropriate decisional capacity. This is in sharp contrast with the same American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) document which he cited, and which, interestingly, refers specifically to parents refusing diagnostic lumbar puncture, which has perhaps escaped Dr. Groselj's attention. It specifically advises that the physician should obtain parental permission to initiate the appropriate treatment rather than delaying care or risking liability for performing that procedure without appropriate authorization.[1] This is why we do not agree with his suggestion and opts to remain compliant with the AAP statement. We embarked on the study to better understand the specific barriers for LP consent in our own environment. The law governing consent issues in the country where the study was held specifically gives the authority of consent to the parents until the child is 18 years old, as until then, he/she is considered as
World J Pediatr, Vol 10 No 1 . February 15, 2014 . www.wjpch.com
89
Correspondence
he recently published article by Narchi et al [1] brings an important empirical insight into a very complex issue of parental consent for lumbar puncture (LP) in
Data Loading...
