Between Real World and Thought Experiment: Framing Moral Decision-Making in Self-Driving Car Dilemmas
- PDF / 511,721 Bytes
- 24 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 47 Downloads / 190 Views
Between Real World and Thought Experiment: Framing Moral Decision-Making in Self-Driving Car Dilemmas Vanessa Schäffner 1 Received: 7 July 2020 / Accepted: 10 November 2020/ # The Author(s) 2020
Abstract
How should driverless vehicles respond to situations of unavoidable personal harm? This paper takes up the case of self-driving cars as a prominent example of algorithmic moral decision-making, an emergent type of morality that is evolving at a high pace in a digitised business world. As its main contribution, it juxtaposes dilemma decision situations relating to ethical crash algorithms for autonomous cars to two edge cases: the case of manually driven cars facing reallife, mundane accidents, on the one hand, and the dilemmatic situation in theoretically constructed trolley cases, on the other. The paper identifies analogies and disanalogies between the three cases with regard to decision makers, decision design, and decision outcomes. The findings are discussed from the angle of three perspectives: aspects where analogies could be found, those where the case of self-driving cars has turned out to lie in between both edge cases, and those where it entirely departs from either edge case. As a main result, the paper argues that manual driving as well as trolley cases are suitable points of reference for the issue of designing ethical crash algorithms only to a limited extent. Instead, a fundamental epistemic and conceptual divergence of dilemma decision situations in the context of self-driving cars and the used edge cases is substantiated. Finally, the areas of specific need for regulation on the road to introducing autonomous cars are pointed out and related thoughts are sketched through the lens of the humanistic paradigm. Keywords Ethics of algorithmic decision-making . Autonomous driving ethics . Ethics for selfdriving cars . Crash algorithms . Moral dilemma . Trolley cases
* Vanessa Schäffner [email protected]
1
Philosophische Fakultät S.J., Munich School of Philosophy, Kaulbachstraße 31a, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Humanistic Management Journal
Introduction Humanistic Management: State of Research and Research Gap Although humanistic management is a relatively young field of research that has emerged mainly during the last ten years, its body of literature covers a broad range of subjects. Among the key topics are practical issues arising with management practices in organizational contexts as well as theoretical investigations into corresponding terms and concepts. The question of what humanistic management actually means has continuously been developed in seminal works (e.g. Bachmann et al. 2018; Melé 2016; Von Kimakowitz et al. 2011). Aspects that are given particular attention are – above all – the notion of human dignity in both conceptual and practical terms (e.g. Bal 2017; Kostera and Pirson 2017) and issues of responsibility (e.g. Glauner 2019; Pirson 2019), sustainability (e.g. Ferguson et al. 2019; Sasse-Werhahn 2019), and freedom (e.g. Dierksmeier 2018a; Pirson 2018). Another widely
Data Loading...
