Beyond VoF: alternative OpenFOAM solvers for numerical wave tanks
- PDF / 2,598,945 Bytes
- 16 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 51 Downloads / 152 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Beyond VoF: alternative OpenFOAM solvers for numerical wave tanks Pál Schmitt1
· Christian Windt2 · Josh Davidson3 · John V. Ringwood2 · Trevor Whittaker1
Received: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 September 2020 / Published online: 29 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020
Abstract The vast majority of numerical wave tank applications are solved using finite volume-based, volume of fluid methods. One popular numerical modelling framework is OpenFOAM and its two phase solvers, interFoam and interIsoFoam, enabling the simulation of a broad range of marine hydrodynamic phenomena. However, in many applications, certain aspects of the entire set of possible hydrodynamic phenomena are not of interest and the reduced complexity could allow the use of simpler, more computationally efficient solvers. One barrier for the application of such alternative solvers is the lack of suitable wavemaking and absorption capabilities, which this paper aims to address. A wavemaking and absorption methodology is presented, which can be applied to different solvers using the same fundamental concept. The implementation is presented for interFoam and interIsoFoam, as well as two other solvers whose use as numerical wave tanks has not previously been reported in the literature, shallowWaterFoam and potentialFreeSurfaceFoam. Parameter studies are performed to guide the user in the use of the methods. Example applications for two industrially relevant test cases are demonstrated; a multi-frequency wave packet focused at one position over flat bottom and regular waves propagating over a submerged shoal. All solvers yielded useful results, but some complex wave transformations in the shoal case were only resolved by the VoF methods. Alternative methods beyond the already well established VoF methods seem worth considering because potential for significant reductions in computational effort exist.
1 Introduction Numerical simulations are an integral part of offshore and coastal engineering. Despite the often considerable computational cost, the flexibility of numerical tools, allowing investigation of different experimental designs and arbitrary tank layouts, with the ability to passively measure any variable in all locations throughout the tank, have seen an increase in the development of so called numerical wave tanks (NWTs) (Kim et al. 1999; Schmitt et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2016). NWTs have been demonstrated, for many applications, to yield results within the same level of accuracy as experimental tests, providing a reliable virtual test-bed for
B
Pál Schmitt [email protected]
1
Marine Research Group, Queen’s University Belfast, Portaferry BT11 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK
2
Centre for Ocean Energy Research, Maynooth University, Co. Kildare, Ireland
3
Department of Fluid Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
marine engineering, at significantly reduced cost compared to large scale experimental wave tank tests. A major catalyst for the increasing u
Data Loading...
