Chiropractors' attitudes toward drug prescription rights: a narrative review
- PDF / 277,777 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 793.701 pts Page_size
- 121 Downloads / 201 Views
REVIEW
CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES
Open Access
Chiropractors’ attitudes toward drug prescription rights: a narrative review Peter Charles Emary1* and Kent Jason Stuber2
Abstract Background: The right to prescribe drugs remains a contentious issue within the chiropractic profession. Nevertheless, drug prescription by manual therapy providers is currently an important topic. Notably, physiotherapists in the United Kingdom were recently granted limited independent prescribing rights. Reports suggest that physiotherapists in Australia now want those same rights, and as such a review of chiropractors’ general attitudes toward drug prescription is needed. Objective: To examine the literature concerning chiropractors’ attitudes toward drug prescription rights and to compare the opinions of chiropractors currently licensed to prescribe medication with those in the profession who are not. Methods: This was a narrative review, consisting of a formal literature search and summary of included articles. Electronic databases searched included the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Inclusion criteria consisted of prospective studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Studies were required to contain data on chiropractors’ opinions toward medication prescription rights. Results: Of 33 articles identified, a total of seven surveys were included in the review. Of these, there was a general split in opinion among chiropractors regarding the right to prescribe drugs in chiropractic practice. Those supportive of prescribing rights favoured a limited number of over-the-counter and/or prescription-based medications such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and muscle relaxants. When questioned on full prescribing rights, however, chiropractors were generally opposed. In jurisdictions where chiropractors are currently licensed to prescribe from a limited formulary, such as in Switzerland, the majority perceived this right as an advantage for the profession. Moreover, continuing education in pharmacology was viewed as a necessary component of this privilege. Conclusions: Based on the literature to date there is a general split in chiropractors’ attitudes toward drug prescription rights. This split is most pronounced in countries where chiropractors are not licensed to prescribe medications. Notwithstanding, this is an important topic in chiropractic currently and warrants both further discussion and research to determine future directions and the implications of either pursuit or denial of prescription rights by chiropractors. Future surveys and/or qualitative studies of other chiropractors’ opinions toward gaining prescription privileges would be timely. Keywords: Knowledge, Attitudes, Drug prescriptions, Chiropractic
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Private Practice, 201C Preston Parkway, Cambridge, ON N3H 5E8, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2014 Emary and Stuber; licensee BioMed Central Lt
Data Loading...
