Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological

  • PDF / 643,500 Bytes
  • 21 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 47 Downloads / 205 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL PAPER

Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological groups Norbertas Noreika1,2



Meelis Pa¨rtel3 • Erik O¨ckinger1

Received: 21 May 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published online: 17 September 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020

Abstract When restoring habitat for biodiversity, the most effective outcome will be achieved by restoration projects which target several organism groups or ecosystem types. Such integrated approaches require direct comparisons among different ecological communities while evaluating success of restoration. The Community Completeness Index (CCI) is a recently developed metric that allows such comparisons by accounting for both present and absent but otherwise suitable taxa. We empirically evaluated the applicability of CCI for assessing the outcome of ecological restoration. We analyzed how species richness and the completeness of ecological communities recover after restoration, for different ecological groups and ecosystem types, and how it develops over time after restoration. Analyses were performed on 18 datasets with per site presence-absence data from Northern Europe. Each dataset represented one of the three habitat types (mire, forest, grassland) and different ecological groups (plants, flying insects, epigeic invertebrates). Datasets contained pristine, degraded and restored sites. We calculated the dark diversity and subsequently CCI based on species co-occurrences. Our multiple-study analyses revealed that CCI of grassland plant communities increased faster after restoration than invertebrate communities or plant communities in forests and mires. In addition, flying insect communities demonstrated significantly highest CCI in pristine mires. Some results were significant only for richness but not for CCI indicating species pool effect. Finally, completeness and species richness of restored communities increased with time since restoration. As such, our study demonstrated that CCI is a useful tool in evaluating restoration success across different organism groups and ecosystem types. Keywords Dark diversity  Habitat restoration  Species co-occurrences  Species pool  Species richness  Time lag

Communicated by Louise Amy Ashton. & Norbertas Noreika [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article

123

3808

Biodiversity and Conservation (2020) 29:3807–3827

Introduction The Anthropocene is characterized by rapid human-caused ecosystem loss and degradation (Lewis and Maslin 2015; Ellis 2018). To meet international targets on halting biodiversity loss, the importance of ecological restoration is widely emphasized (Suding 2011). In order to reveal if restoration targets are met, restoration actions require evaluations of their success, which is overall a key subject for the development of restoration ecology (Suding 2011). Nevertheless, how to evaluate restoration success is highly debatable (see e.g., Hobbs et al. 2009;