Correction to: Coupled Self-Organized Hydrodynamics and Stokes Models for Suspensions of Active Particles
- PDF / 232,115 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
- 78 Downloads / 173 Views
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
Correction
Correction to: Coupled Self-Organized Hydrodynamics and Stokes Models for Suspensions of Active Particles Pierre Degond , Sara Merino-Aceituno, Fabien Vergnet and Hui Yu
Correction to: J. Math. Fluid Mech. (2019) 21:6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-019-0406-9 This note provides a list of errata and their correction for Reference [1]. ˜ − 1) should come with a negative sign. This expression • There is a typo in Eq. (5.12): the term in (λ becomes: ˜ − 1)˜b ρ2 k 2 (λ 0 0 2 ¯ Ω iρ0 (−α + V0 · k) + γ|k| ρ0 − 2 |k|2 i 1 ρ0 ˜ ˜ ˜ ¯ = 2λk0 p¯ + b(λ + 1)(ρ0 k + ρ¯k0 ) − ρ¯ k ⊥ . (0.1) 2 |k|2 κ • In the statement of Th. 5.1 (Linear Stability Analysis), we have that Eq. (5.5) is not true. As a consequence equation (5.6) is slightly modified into
˜bρ0 k02 ˜ ˜ −4λ 2 + λ + 1 (−α + U0 · k) D(α, k) = 2|k|2 |k|
2 i k 0 ˜+1 ˜ −c1 k0 −2λ +λ + c1 (|k|2 − k02 ) |k|2 κ ˜ − 1)˜bρ0 k 2 (λ 0 −(−α + U0 · k) i(−α + V0 · k) − + γ|k|2 , (0.2) 2 |k|2 when k¯ = 0. And Eq. (5.7) is valid when k¯ = 0. When k¯ = 0 we have a different scenario where ¯ = 0 arbitrary and ρ¯ = 0 and Ω
˜ − 1)˜b ρ0 k 2 (λ 0 2 α = V0 · k + i − γ|k| , (0.3) 2 |k|2 ˜ ∈ [−1, 1] and so Im(α) ≤ 0. (Finally, notice that, the parameter which gives only stable modes since λ η in the original article does not play a role any more in this corrected version.) The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-019-0406-9. 0123456789().: V,-vol
Page 2 of 3
57
P. Degond et al.
JMFM
To obtain these results we modify the proof of Th. 5.1 Case B, which we rewrite fully next (notice that the number of the equations that do not start by 0 refer to the number of the equations as they appear in the original article). Proof. Case (B) Suppose that k ⊥ = 0. Doing the inner product of Eq. (0.1) with k and using that k ⊥ · k = |k|2 − k02 , the dispersion relation is given by (using Eq. (5.11)):
2 ˜ 2 ρ i 2 λk k 0 0 0 ˜b ˜ + 1 + ρ¯k0 − ˜+1 ˜ +λ +λ − ρ¯ (|k|2 − k02 ) ρ0 k¯ −4λ 2|k|2 |k|2 |k|2 κ ˜ 2 2 ˜ − 1) bρ0 k0 + γ|k|2 ρ0 k, ¯ = iρ0 (−α + V0 · k) − (λ (0.4) 2 |k|2 and from Eq. (5.10b) we have the relation ρ + ρ0 c1 k¯ = 0. (−α + U0 · k)¯
(0.5)
Next we distinguish between the cases k¯ = 0 and k¯ = 0. Suppose that k¯ = 0, then from Eq. (0.5) we have that −α + U0 · k = 0 and multiplying Eq. (0.4) by −α + U0 · k = 0 and using Eq. (0.5), we get the ¯ dispersion relation in Eq. (0.2), after simplifying k. ¯ ¯ = 0 (thanks to Eq. (5.10a)) and, therefore, If, on the contrary, k = 0, then one can check that k ⊥ · Ω ⊥ they are normal. Since by assumption k = 0 from Eq. (0.1) we conclude that the coefficient in front of k ⊥ on the right hand side must be zero. Rewriting this term using that k¯ = 0 and Eq. (5.11) we have that ρ¯ I = 0, (0.6) with ρ0 k0 I := ˜b 2|k|2
˜ 2 i 2λk 0 ˜ − 2 +λ+1 − . |k| κ
From here we deduce that ρ¯ = 0 because otherwise we should have that I = 0 but the imaginary part of ¯ = 0 (otherwise we I is non-zero, so ρ¯ = 0. In particular this implie
Data Loading...
