Correction to: Development and evaluation of an Urdu treebank (CLE-UTB) and a statistical parser

  • PDF / 166,704 Bytes
  • 2 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 106 Downloads / 204 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Correction to: Development and evaluation of an Urdu treebank (CLE-UTB) and a statistical parser Toqeer Ehsan1



Sarmad Hussain2

Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Correction to: Lang Resources & Evaluation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09492-7 In the original publication of the article the column headers of the Tables 17 and 18 were incorrectly published. The corrected version of Tables 17 and 18 are provided with this Correction. The original article has been corrected.

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09492-7. & Toqeer Ehsan [email protected] Sarmad Hussain [email protected] 1

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

2

Center for Language Engineering (CLE), KICS/CS&E, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

123

Lang Resources & Evaluation Table 17 No. of sentences in train and test sets. Test set has been divided into three classes i.e. small, medium and long sentences Dataset

Train

Test

Total

Small (B 10) #Sentences

6881

#Tokens

130,105

Medium (11–25)

Long (> 25)

All test

229

526

218

973

7854

1919

9136

7415

18,470

148,575

Table 18 Parsing results after training two parsers on the CLE-UTB CLE-UTB Version

Gold POS

Predicted POS

Labeled recall (%)

Labeled precision (%)

Labeled f-score (%)

Labeled recall (%)

Labeled precision (%)

Labeled f-score (%)

POS accuracy (%)

Stanford Parser

79.0

77.9

78.4

75.1

74.3

74.7

94.9

BiLSTM Parser

87.1

89.2

88.1

85.7

86.7

86.2

96.3

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

123