Correction to: Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic
- PDF / 227,656 Bytes
- 4 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 26 Downloads / 212 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xing Hu 1 & Xiaojie Huang 2 & Jianhua Hou 2 & Lei Ding 1 & Chunling Su 1 & Fankun Meng 1
# The Author(s) 2020
Correction to: European Radiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8 The original version of this article, published on 24 September 2020, unfortunately contained a mistake. Reference 47 was incorrectly cited in Table 2 and Fig. 3. The corrected versions are given below.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8 * Fankun Meng [email protected] 1
Ultrasound and Functional Diagnosis Center, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8, Xitoutiao, Youanmenwai, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China
2
Center for Infectious Disease, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Romania Prospectively
Italy
Italy
Italy
India
Romania Cross-sectional TE
China
France
Japan
Italy
Korea
Japan
Calvaruso, 2013 [28]
Fraquelli, 2014 [30]
Colecchia, 2012 [11]
Sharma, 2013 [29]
Stefanescu, 2015 [39]
WONG, 2016 [42]
Bastard, 2018 [43]
Takuma, 2013 [14]
Rizzo, 2014 [31]
Kim, 2015 [37]
Takuma, 2016 [41]
TE
TE
pSWE
pSWE
pSWE
pSWE
Italy
Egypt
Romania Cross-sectional pSWE
Italy
Lucchina, 2018 [44]
Darweesh, 2019 [46]
Peagu, 2019 [48]
Giuffre, 2019 [50]
Cross-sectional pSWE
Cross-sectional pSWE
Cross-sectional pSWE
Germany Cross-sectional pSWE
Vermehren, 2012 [26]
Fierbinteanu-Braticevici, Romania Prospective pSWE 2019 [47] Bota, 2012 [25] Romania Cross-sectional pSWE
Prospective
Prospective
Prospective
Prospectively
Cross-sectional TE
Cross-sectional TE
Cross-sectional TE
Cross-sectional TE
Prospective
Prospective
TE
RTE
Stefanescu, 2011 [24]
Prospectively
Japan
Hirooka, 2011 [23]
Hitachi, Japan FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France FibroScan, France Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Philips, Netherlands Siemens, Germany Siemens, Germany Philips, Netherlands 95.5
NR
99.0
77.8
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
97.9 100
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
EGD
NR
96.8
95.5
100
95.5
NR
84.1
NR
89.0
88.5
83.3
85.7
85.4
NR
210
178
200
42
166
142
135
60
125
54
340
193
144
90
174
100
110
96
122
210
68
60
55
NR
54
59
60
71
59
72
68
59
58
56
49
54
52
63
56
62
Technique Manufacturer The proportion of Gold No. of Mean successful SSM standard patients age (%) (year)
Location Study design
NR
62.0 24.7
55.1 NR
55.5 NR
NR
65.7 26.0
60.0 26.7
57.4 NR
56.7 23.4
64.0 NR
53.7 NR
52.0 23.5
67.9 26.2
79.2 24.4
55.6 26.7
88.5 24.6
71.0 25.0
59.1 23.0
69.8 27.0
56.2 26.4
53.8 < 25.0
100
100
95.5
100
100
100
100
100
Data Loading...
