Correction to: Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in pat
- PDF / 121,714 Bytes
- 1 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 83 Downloads / 144 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy? Olivia H. Chang 1
&
Emily R. W. Davidson 1 & Tonya N. Thomas 1 & Marie Fidela R. Paraiso 1 & Cecile A. Ferrando 1
# The International Urogynecological Association 2020
Correction to: International Urogynecology Journal (2020) 31:2075–2080 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04268-7 In the originally published article, an error was found in the 6th paragraph of the Results section. Current version: Of the three patients in the SCP group who underwent surgical retreatment, 66.7% (2) received an isolated anterior colporrhaphy. In the SCP + PR group, five patients (45.5%) underwent an apical suspension and four (36.3%) underwent an isolated posterior colporrhaphy. Correct version: Of the three patients in the SCP + PR group who underwent surgical retreatment, 66.7% (2) received an isolated anterior colporrhaphy. In the SCP group, five patients (45.5%) underwent an apical suspension and four (36.3%) underwent an isolated posterior colporrhaphy.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00192-020-04268-7 * Olivia H. Chang [email protected] 1
Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A81, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
Data Loading...