Correction to: Effect of Process Parameters on Defects, Melt Pool Shape, Microstructure, and Tensile Behavior of 316L St
- PDF / 1,574,073 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 11 Downloads / 232 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Effect of Process Parameters on Defects, Melt Pool Shape, Microstructure, and Tensile Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Produced by Selective Laser Melting Hua‑Zhen Jiang1,2 · Zheng‑Yang Li2 · Tao Feng3 · Peng‑Yue Wu3 · Qi‑Sheng Chen1,2 · Yun‑Long Feng3 · Long‑Fei Chen3 · Jing‑Yu Hou1,2 · He‑Jian Xu2
© The Chinese Society for Metals (CSM) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Correction to: Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-020-01143-8
In the Original Publication of the article, some reference numbers in the Figs. 1, 5, 14 and Appendixes B, C, D are mismatched. The corrected reference numbers in the figures and appendixes are given below.
Fig. 1 Normalized process map showing the location of dimensional variables corresponding to the experimental process parameters selected from Table 1. (The experimental data are enclosed in the blue dashed rectangle and the boundary of the experimental data in Ref. [16] is the black dashed rectangle.) Contours of constant normalized equivalent energy density, E0*, are provided by the dashed lines
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40195-020-01143-8. * Zheng‑Yang Li [email protected] * Qi‑Sheng Chen [email protected] 1
School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3
Beijing E-Plus-3D Technology Co., LTD, Beijing 102299, China
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-020-01157-2
Fig. 5 Effect of process parameters on relative density: a density measurement results, b a normalized processing diagram showing the location of high-density (> 99%) SLM-processed part. The dashed lines represent contours of constant E0*
Fig. 14 Summary of ultimate tensile strength versus elongation to failure for 316L SS from our work and previous studies. (The mechanical performance range of conventional wrought 316L SS is shown in the block region; HFA—hot finished + annealed; CFA—cold finished + annealed; CF—cold finished.)
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Correction to: Effect of Process Parameters on Defects, Melt Pool Shape, Microstructure, and…
Appendix B An example of using 24 OM images to examine the relative density of a SLM-manufactured part at a certain process parameter (Sample No. 12)
Sample
Liu et al. [11] Sun et al. for 380 W sample [9] Wang et al. [39] Elangeswaran et al. [47] Riemer et al. [48]
YS (MPa) UTS (MPa) Uniform εf (%) elongation (%) 456 552 567
– 453 462 512 Suryawanshi et al. [29] 430 536 449 517 463 Kurzynowski et al. [49] 454 440 409 Hot finished + annealed 170 [50] Cold finished + annealed 170 [50] Cold finished [50] 310
703 – 660*
– – –
46 83 40*
590 573 565 622 509 668 528 687 687 750 662 674 480
21 – – – – – – – – – – – –
– 46 54 20 12 25 12 32 25 29 28 26 40
480
–
30
620
–
30
Appendix C The maximal temperature rising of a G
Data Loading...
