Correction to: Evaluative Analysis of Formulas of Heat Transfer Coefficient of Rock Fracture

  • PDF / 472,474 Bytes
  • 2 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 34 Downloads / 190 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Correction to: Evaluative Analysis of Formulas of Heat Transfer Coefficient of Rock Fracture Yinqiang Jiang1,2 · Huayan Yao1 · Yinxiang Cui2,3 · Hongwu Lei2,3 · Yuanyuan He2 · Bing Bai2,3

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Correction to: International Journal of Thermophysics (2020) 41:104 https​://doi.org/10.1007/s1076​5-020-02679​-8 The original version of the article unfortunately contained an inappropriate reference to formula H. This formula taken from Eq. (11) of Ref. [8] was not the original work of the authors of Ref. [8]. We need to remove all the contents related to formula H in the article. • In the Abstract

“… 214 test records are employed to evaluate 8 existing formulas from literature.” needs to be modified as: “…214 test records are employed to evaluate 7 existing formulas from literature”. • In section 2

Delete the H row (the last row) of Table 1 and the H column (the fifteenth column) of Table 3 related to formula H. “…implying that the applicability of Formulas B and H is poor” needs to be modified to: “… implying that the applicability of Formula B is poor”. The H series needs to be removed from Fig. 1. The original article can be found online at https​://doi.org/10.1007/s1076​5-020-02679​-8. * Bing Bai [email protected] 1

School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230041, China

2

State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

3

Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo‑Environmental Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China



13

Vol.:(0123456789)

143  

Page 2 of 2

International Journal of Thermophysics

(2020) 41:143

• In the Conclusion

“… 8 existing HTC formulas were conducted with 214 test records” needs to be modified to “… 7 existing HTC formulas were conducted with 214 test records”. “Formulas B and H showed relatively poor applicability …” needs to be modified to “Formula B showed relatively poor applicability …”. The original article has been corrected. Publisher’s Note  Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

13