Correction to: Patterns of genetic partitioning and gene flow in the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys
- PDF / 412,546 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 27 Downloads / 161 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Patterns of genetic partitioning and gene flow in the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) and implications for conservation management Sarah Hendricks1 · Asako Y. Navarro1 · Thea Wang1 · Aryn Wilder1 · Oliver A. Ryder1 · Debra M. Shier1
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020
Correction to: Conservation Genetics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-020-01289-z
In the Original publication of the article, Table 2 was published incorrectly. The correct Table 2 is given in this Correction. The original article has been corrected. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10592-020-01289-z. * Sarah Hendricks [email protected] * Debra M. Shier [email protected] 1
San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA 92027, USA
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Conservation Genetics
Table 2 Summary statistics from microsatellite data among the range-wide sites: sample size (N), allelic richness (AR), private allelic richness (PAR), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected hetPopulation
Site
Lytle Creek and Cajon Creek – Hwy210, Lytle and Cajon Creeks Glen Helen, Cajon Creek Institution, Cajon Creek Lytle Creek Bank, Lytle Creek Cajon Creek Bank, Cajon Creek San Jacinto River – Lake Park Dr. San Jacinto Hemet Valle Vista Santa Ana River – Redlands Mountain View SBV & Cone Camp
13
N
erozygosity (HE), weighted inbreeding coefficients (FIS) along with its associated p value, and effective population size ( NE) with 95% CI AR
PAR Ho
51 10.86 2.57 3 3.64 0 7 5.5 0.07 1 1.86 0.07 19 7.07 0 21 9.5 0.43 61 5.57 0.57 5 2.64 0 22 3.93 0 19 3.79 0.14 15 4.5 0.21 57 9.29 1.21 22 5.64 0.14 15 6.14 0.14 20 8.07 0.71
0.78 0.76 0.85 0.86 0.76 0.77 0.58 0.49 0.52 0.54 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.78
He
F
Ne (95% CI)
wang(xy)
0.8 0.62 0.72 0.43 0.74 0.81 0.62 0.45 0.54 0.55 0.64 0.78 0.7 0.69 0.77
0.043 – – – 0.039 0.069 0.067 0.065 0.095 0.112 0.003 0.075 0.057 0.088 0.061
85.8 (67.7–114.2) − 2.9 (− 3.3–infinity) − 164.5 (44.3–infinity) − 0.3 (− 0.3–infinity) 34.8 (25.7–51.2) 130.5 (76–400.7) 14.7 (10.9–19.6) 2.1 (1.4–5.9) 31.1 (17.3–84.1) 11 (7.3–17.2) 39.4 (19.5–235.7) 30.4 (26.2–35.7) 9.1 (7.3–11.5) 13.9 (10.8–18.3) 60.9 (42.6–101.7)
0.01 0.00 0.00 – 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.20 0.11 0.16 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.17 0.03
Data Loading...
