Correction to: The application of deep learning for the classification of correct and incorrect SNP genotypes from whole
- PDF / 134,022 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 35 Downloads / 186 Views
		    CORRECTION
 
 Correction to: The application of deep learning for the classification of correct and incorrect SNP genotypes from whole-genome DNA sequencing pipelines Krzysztof Kotlarz 1 & Magda Mielczarek 1,2 & Tomasz Suchocki 1,2 & Bartosz Czech 1 & Bernt Guldbrandtsen 3 & Joanna Szyda 1,2
 
 # Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan 2020
 
 Correction to: Journal of Applied Genetics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-020-00586-0 The original version on this paper contained an error. Figure 5 was published with the same image of figure 4. The correct figure 5 is presented here. The original article has been corrected.
 
 The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13353-020-00586-0 * Joanna Szyda [email protected] 1
 
 Biostatistics Group, Department of Genetics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kozuchowska 7, 51-631, Wroclaw, Poland
 
 2
 
 Institute of Animal Breeding, Balice, Poland
 
 3
 
 Animal Breeding Group, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
 
 J Appl Genetics Fig. 5 Classification of validation data by the different algorithms, based on the probability cutoff thresholds estimated for the F1 or SUMSS metrics. The numbers above columns represent TP— percentages of true positive results, TN—percentages of true negative results, F1—values of the F1 metric
 
 100
 
 100
 
 F1
 
 TP
 
 SUMSS
 
 80 62 60 45
 
 %
 
 42
 
 42
 
 40 20 0
 
 100
 
 22
 
 19
 
 19
 
 NAIVE
 
 WEIGHTED
 
 OVERSAMPLED30
 
 97
 
 97 87
 
 80
 
 OVERSAMPLED60
 
 OVERSAMPLED100
 
 TN
 
 99
 
 99
 
 22
 
 22
 
 97 89
 
 89
 
 73
 
 60
 
 % 40 20 0
 
 1 NAIVE
 
 WEIGHTED
 
 0.21
 
 0.21
 
 OVERSAMPLED30
 
 OVERSAMPLED60
 
 OVERSAMPLED100
 
 0.17
 
 0.17
 
 0.17
 
 OVERSAMPLED30
 
 OVERSAMPLED60
 
 OVERSAMPLED100
 
 0.5
 
 0.4
 
 0.3
 
 F1 0.2
 
 0.1
 
 0.0 NAIVE
 
 Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
 
 WEIGHTED		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	