Correction to: Transformative experience and the shark problem
- PDF / 162,292 Bytes
- 1 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 7 Downloads / 224 Views
Correction to: Transformative experience and the shark problem Tim Campbell1
•
Julia Mosquera1
Springer Nature B.V. 2020
Correction to: Philos Stud https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01382-1 In the original publication of the article, the last paragraph on page 15 under Section 4 that reads ‘‘Finally, for reasons…..outcomes to which it doesn’t.’’ was repeated. The correct paragraph is given below: Finally, for reasons that we saw in Sect. 2, we do not think that appealing to vagueness will help with these problems. Suppose that some outcomes in S are borderline—it is neither determinately true that they are sharky nor determinately false that they are sharky—and that there is no higher-order vagueness. Should the agent follow the revelation approach when evaluating borderline outcomes, but not when evaluating sharky outcomes? If so, then in S there will be a sharp demarcation between outcomes to which the Revelation Approach applies and outcomes to which it doesn’t.
The original article has been corrected. The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01382-1. & Julia Mosquera [email protected] Tim Campbell [email protected] 1
Institute for Futures Studies, Holla¨ndargatan 13, Box 591, 101 31 Stockholm, Sweden
123
Data Loading...
