Correction to: Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and fac
- PDF / 210,947 Bytes
- 4 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 67 Downloads / 204 Views
CORRECTION
Open Access
Correction to: Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators Rebecca Sheridan1, Jacqueline Martin-Kerry1, Joanna Hudson2, Adwoa Parker1, Peter Bower3 and Peter Knapp4* Correction to: Trials 21, 259 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3 Following publication of the original article [1], we were notified that a few lines in Table 2 were misaligned. The correct Table 2 is presented below.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063020-4197-3. * Correspondence: [email protected] 4 University of York and the Hull York Medical School, York, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Sheridan et al. Trials
(2020) 21:840
Page 2 of 4
Table 2 Identified psychosocial facilitators and barriers to research participation, mapped to tested recruitment interventions and the Theoretical Domains Framework. [Key: (−) Negative effect on recruitment; (?) Uncertain effect on recruitment] Identified theme
Systematic Reviews reporting the theme
Domain (components) of the TDF. (from Cane et al, 2012)
Interventions which probably affect recruitment to research. (from Treweek et al, 2018)
Interventions shown not to affect recruitment to research, or with uncertain effects. (from Treweek et al, 2018)
Personal benefit (including therapeutic benefits; closer monitoring; access to new treatments; gaining knowledge of own health)
Dhalla, 2014; Fayter, 2007; Fisher, 2011; Grand, 2012; Hughes-Morley, 2015; Liljas, 2017; Limkakeng, 2013a; Limkakeng, 2013b; McCann, 2007; McCann, 2013; Martinsen, 2016; Nalubega, 2015; Nievaard, 2004; Nobile, 2013; Quay, 2017; Tromp, 2016.
Optimism (Reflective Motivation) Beliefs about consequences (Reflective Motivation) Goals (Reflective Motivation) Reinforcement (Automatic Motivation)
Mentioning scarcity of trial places. Positive framing of potential treatment benefits.
Data Loading...
