Could the Buddha Have Been a Naturalist?

  • PDF / 374,774 Bytes
  • 20 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 100 Downloads / 207 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Could the Buddha Have Been a Naturalist? Chien-Te Lin 1 # Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Abstract With the naturalist worldview having become widely accepted, the trend of naturalistic Buddhism has likewise become popular in both academic and religious circles. In this article, I preliminarily reflect on this naturalized approach to Buddhism in two main sections. In section 1, I point out that the Buddha rejects theistic beliefs that claim absolute power over our destiny, opting instead to encourage us to inquire intellectually and behave morally. The distinguishing characteristics of naturalism such as a humanistic approach, rational enquiry, empirical observation, as well as a pragmatic and realistic outlook can all be seen in the Buddha’s teachings. In section 2, however, I advance arguments to show that while the Buddha is opposed to theistic doctrines, his views are not entirely in accordance with the presuppositions of naturalism. Firstly, the Buddha’s foremost concern is not purely intellectual in nature—the purpose of his teachings is to realize a soteriological goal through spiritual practice. Secondly, naturalism tends to subscribe to ‘self-being,’ while the Buddha holds all things to exist conditionally and impermanently. Because of the dependent nature of all things, it is not possible to discover their essence through reduction. Thirdly, naturalized philosophy would be a kind of belief-habit that follows from certain preconditioned assumptions. But the Buddha encourages us to re-examine our conceptual proliferation leading to biased views, as that ultimately leads to suffering. I conclude by proposing a broader naturalist outlook that would allow for a more inclusive conception of the natural world that would take the axiological dimension of human transcendence into account and increase an overall understanding of human potentiality. Keywords Naturalism . Buddhism naturalized . Transcendence . Axiology . Soteriology .

Dependent arising . Emptiness

* Chien-Te Lin [email protected]; [email protected]

1

Institute of Religion and Humanity, Buddhist Tzu-Chi University, No. 67 Jie Ren Street, Hualien, Taiwan

C.-T. Lin

Introduction Naturalism is the idea that reality can be exhausted by nature. This philosophy developed from discussions around the second half of the twentieth century, gradually gaining ground on the basis of the argument that even philosophical questions can be solved without resorting to methods involving a priori theorizing. The presuppositions of naturalism have come to define much of the terms of contemporary academic debate on topics such as epistemology, metaphysics, and even axiology. As W. V. Quine (1960, 3) put it: ‘the philosopher and the scientist are in the same boat,’ pointing out the continuity between philosophy and science. Today, the overwhelming majority of philosophers in the English-speaking world are naturalists (Ritchie 2008, 1); topics such as naturalized philosophy, naturalized ethics, naturalized aesthetic, and naturalized religion are explored with great inte