CTC with 6mm lesion threshold cost effective for CRC screening

  • PDF / 139,581 Bytes
  • 1 Pages / 623.591 x 841.847 pts Page_size
  • 48 Downloads / 176 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Parameters: Prevention of CRC (%) Cost/life-year gaineda ($US) ICERb ($US)

FS

OC

CTC-no threshold

CTC-6mm threshold

31.4

40.4

37.8

36.5

7407

9180

7138

4361

118 440

-

dominated 63 900

versus no screening b incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; compared with CTC using 6mm threshold a

The sensitivity of polyps measuring ≥ 6mm would have to fall by 46% and 24% with screening by optical colonoscopy and CTC without threshold, respectively, for these practices to match the cost-effectiveness of CTC with nonreporting of diminutive lesions. * costs were those relating to the screening test, bleeding, perforation and CRC treatment Pickhardt PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive 801081470 lesions. Cancer 109: 2213-2221, No. 11, 1 Jun 2007

1173-5503/10/0535-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 25 Aug 2007 No. 535

1