Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review
- PDF / 2,456,333 Bytes
- 19 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 41 Downloads / 178 Views
(2020) 20:222
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review Bey-Marrié Schmidt1,2* , Christopher J. Colvin2,3,4, Ameer Hohlfeld1 and Natalie Leon3,5
Abstract Background: Data harmonisation (DH) has emerged amongst health managers, information technology specialists and researchers as an important intervention for routine health information systems (RHISs). It is important to understand what DH is, how it is defined and conceptualised, and how it can lead to better health management decision-making. This scoping review identifies a range of definitions for DH, its characteristics (in terms of key components and processes), and common explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Methods: This scoping review identified relevant studies from 2000 onwards (date filter), written in English and published in PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened records for potential inclusion for the abstract and full-text screening stages. One reviewer did the data extraction, analysis and synthesis, with built-in reliability checks from the rest of the team. We developed a narrative synthesis of definitions and explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Results: We sampled 61 of 181 included to synthesis definitions and concepts of DH in detail. We identified six common terms for data harmonisation: record linkage, data linkage, data warehousing, data sharing, data interoperability and health information exchange. We also identified nine key components of data harmonisation: DH involves (a) a process of multiple steps; (b) integrating, harmonising and bringing together different databases (c) two or more databases; (d) electronic data; (e) pooling data using unique patient identifiers; and (f) different types of data; (g) data found within and across different departments and institutions at facility, district, regional and national levels; (h) different types of technical activities; (i) has a specific scope. The relationship between DH and health management decision-making is not well-described in the literature. Several studies mentioned health providers’ concerns about data completeness, data quality, terminology and coding of data elements as barriers to data utilisation for clinical decision-making. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this scoping review was the first to synthesise definitions and concepts of DH and address the causal relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Future research is required to assess the effectiveness of data harmonisation on health management decision-making. Keywords: Data harmonisation, Health information exchange, Health information system, Scoping review * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zijl Dr, Parow Valley, Cape Town 7501, South Africa 2 Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Heal
Data Loading...
