Determining Expected Research Skills of Medical Students on Graduation: a Systematic Review
- PDF / 832,446 Bytes
- 15 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 35 Downloads / 219 Views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Determining Expected Research Skills of Medical Students on Graduation: a Systematic Review Melissa G. Y. Lee 1,2 & Wendy C. Y. Hu 3 & Justin L. C. Bilszta 4
# International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020
Abstract Background Global interest in research skills in undergraduate medical education is growing. There is no consensus regarding expected research skills of medical students on graduation. We conducted a systematic review to determine the aims and intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of mandatory research components of undergraduate medical curricula incorporating the teaching, assessment, and evaluation methods of these programs. Methods Using the PRISMA protocol, MEDLINE and ERIC databases were searched with keywords related to “medical student research programs” for relevant articles published up until February 2020. Thematic analysis was conducted according to student experience/reactions, mentoring/career development, and knowledge/skill development. Results Of 4880 citations, 41 studies from 30 institutions met the inclusion criteria. Programs were project-based in 24 (80%) and coursework only–based in 6 (20%). Program aims/ILOs were stated in 24 programs (80%). Twenty-seven different aims/ILOs were identified: 19 focused on knowledge/skill development, 4 on experience/reactions, and 4 on mentoring/career development. Project-based programs aimed to provide an in-depth research experience, foster/increase research skills, and critically appraise scientific literature. Coursework-based programs aimed to foster/apply analytical skills for decision-making in healthcare and critically appraise scientific literature. Reporting of interventions was often incomplete, short term, and single institution. There was poor alignment between aims, teaching, assessment, and evaluation methods in most. Conclusions The diversity of teaching programs highlights challenges in defining core competencies in research skills for medical graduates. Incomplete reporting limits the evidence for effective research skills education; we recommend those designing and reporting educational interventions adopt recognized educational reporting criteria when describing their findings. Whether students learn by “doing”, “proposing to do”, or “critiquing”, good curriculum design requires constructive alignment between teaching, assessment, and evaluation methods, aims, and outcomes. Peer-reviewed publications and presentations only evaluate one aspect of the student research experience. Keywords Medical students . Research project . Scholarly concentration . Intended learning outcomes . Curriculum design
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01059-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Justin L. C. Bilszta [email protected] Melissa G. Y. Lee [email protected]
1
Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Flemington, Victoria 3052, Australia
2
Departm
Data Loading...
