Does image-guided biopsy of discitis-osteomyelitis provide meaningful information to impact clinical management?

  • PDF / 1,683,181 Bytes
  • 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 96 Downloads / 189 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

Does image-guided biopsy of discitis-osteomyelitis provide meaningful information to impact clinical management? Elisha Lim 1

&

William Walter 1 & Soterios Gyftopoulos 1 & Mohammad Samim 1

Received: 11 September 2020 / Revised: 30 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 November 2020 # ISS 2020

Abstract Objective The aims of this study are to assess the diagnostic yield of image-guided biopsy for discitis-osteomyelitis (DO), identify factors associated with biopsy yield (laboratory, pre-defined MRI findings, and biopsy technique), and impact of biopsy on management of patients appropriately selected according to the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines (IDSA). Materials and methods This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent biopsy for suspected DO from 2011 to 2019. Reference standards to establish diagnosis of DO in order were histopathology/microbiology from biopsy or subsequent surgical sampling, positive blood culture or serology, and imaging/clinical follow-up. Laboratory markers, pre-biopsy antibiotics and MRI features, procedural-related variables, and impact of biopsy on management were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed. Results Out of 97 included patients, 78 were diagnosed with DO. Overall sensitivity of biopsy for detecting DO was 41.0% (32/ 78), including 10 patients with positive histopathology only, 14 with positive biopsy culture only, and 8 with both. Elevated ESR (p < 0.001) and epidural collection on MRI (p = 0.008) were associated with higher biopsy yield (63.6% and 68.6%, respectively) in a multivariable model. Procedural variables were not associated with yield. Biopsy results impacted the management in 19/77 (24.7%) patients, of whom 15/19 (78.9%) had treatment de-escalation and 4/19 (21.0%) had treatment escalation including starting new anti-tuberculous and anti-fungal regimens. Conclusion Sensitivity of biopsy for detecting DO was 41.0%. When IDSA guidelines are followed, biopsy provided impactful information that changed the management in 24.7% of patients. Evaluation for elevated ESR and epidural collection can help improve yield and patient selection for biopsy. Keywords Discitis-osteomyelitis . MRI features of discitis-osteomyelitis . Image-guided biopsy . Biopsy yield

Abbreviations CRP C-reactive protein DO Discitis-osteomyelitis ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate FN False negative IDSA Infectious Disease Society of America MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MSSA Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus TN True negative TP True positive

* Elisha Lim [email protected] 1

NYU Langone Health, Department of Radiology at Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Rm 600, New York, NY 10003, USA

Introduction Discitis-osteomyelitis (DO) is a rare diagnosis, estimated to occur in only 4–24 patients per million per year [1]. The diagnosis of DO is difficult and often delayed due to nonspecific clinical presentation, such as insidious back pain; more specific symptoms like fever and neurologic