Erratum to: Fertilization of SRC Willow, II: Leaching and Element Balances
- PDF / 164,473 Bytes
- 4 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 35 Downloads / 196 Views
ERRATUM
Erratum to: Fertilization of SRC Willow, II: Leaching and Element Balances Lisbeth Sevel & Morten Ingerslev & Thomas Nord-Larsen & Uffe Jørgensen & Peter E. Holm & Kirsten Schelde & Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen
Published online: 7 November 2013 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Erratum to: Bioenerg. Res. DOI 10.1007/s12155-013-9370-z The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes. Fig. 2: The presented values for Manure(240) treatment in fig. 2 were wrong. The corrected figure is presented here. Table 6, 7 and 8: The lowercase letters indicating significant difference between treatments were shown as normal letters. This has been corrected in this version.
The online version of the original article can be found at http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9370-z. L. Sevel (*) Dalgasgroup, 12 Klostermarken, 8800 Viborg, Denmark e-mail: [email protected] M. Ingerslev : T. Nord-Larsen : K. Raulund-Rasmussen Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 23 Rolighedsvej, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark U. Jørgensen : K. Schelde Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, P.O.Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark P. E. Holm Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 40 Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
462
Fig. 2 Concentrations of N (nitrate), P, K and Cd for control, 240 and 360 treatments over the two years. Different degrees of square filling illustrate the use of interpolated results due to missing samples. Filled squares illustrate measured values from all three blocks, hour-glass filled squares illustrate measured values from two blocks and interpolation
Bioenerg. Res. (2014) 7:461–464
from the third block, diagonally filled squares illustrate measured values from one block and interpolated values from two blocks, and open squares illustrate interpolation values from all three blocks. See text for further explanation
Bioenerg. Res. (2014) 7:461–464 Table 6 Macro nutrient concentrations in the biomass, values in brackets are standard deviation
463
Treatment
Control NPK60+60 NPK120 NPK120+120
Lowercase letters indicate significant different concentrations between treatments
Table 7 Heavy metal concentrations in the biomass, values in brackets are standard deviation
Lowercase letters indicate significant different concentrations between treatments
mg g-1 dw C
N
490 (30)
4.0c (0.4)
500 (30) 500 (20) 500 (20)
P
bc
4.7 (0.4) bc
4.3 (0.6) abc
5.3
(0.3)
bc
K
Ca
Mg
1.14a (0.07)
3.6 (0.34)
3.2 (0.26)
0.50a (0.01)
bcd
(0.04)
3.6 (0.31)
2.9 (0.19)
0.44abc (0.02)
cde
1.00
(0.09)
3.0 (0.43)
2.9 (0.16)
0.43bc (0.01)
de
0.94 (0.03)
3.0 (0.11)
2.7 (0.33)
0.38c (0.01)
e
0.39c (0.04)
0.97
NPK240
490 (20)
4.6 (1.0)
0.88 (0.07)
3.0 (0.09)
2.8 (0.46)
NPK360
490 (20)
6.1a (0.6)
1.10bc (0.08)
3.5 (0.36)
3.4 (0.25)
0.47ab (0.02)
Manure120
490 (20)
4.4bc (1.2)
0.95cde (0.01)
3.1 (0.18)
2.6 (0.35)
0.44abc (0.05)
Manure240
500 (30)
5.1abc (0.6)
1.0
Data Loading...
