Erratum to: Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting
- PDF / 110,136 Bytes
- 1 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 71 Downloads / 148 Views
ERRATUM
Erratum to: Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting Lars de Vroege • Rob Hoedeman • Jasper Nuyen • Klaas Sijtsma • Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis
Published online: 21 August 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Erratum to: J Occup Rehabil (2012) 22(1):51–58 DOI 10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6 In the above-mentioned article, the efficiency rates in Table 2 are wrong. The correct efficiency rates should be: PHQ15 C 6
PHQ15 C 7
PHQ15 C 8
PHQ15 C 9
PHQ15 C 10
PHQ15 C 11
36.5 %
44.9 %
53.3 %
59.8 %
65.4 %
69.2 %
The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6. L. de Vroege (&) J. Nuyen C. M. van der Feltz-Cornelis Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] R. Hoedeman Department of Science, ArboNed Occupational Health Services, Utrecht, The Netherlands R. Hoedeman Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands K. Sijtsma Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands C. M. van der Feltz-Cornelis Department of Developmental and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands C. M. van der Feltz-Cornelis Department of Psychiatry, GGZ Breburg Groep, Tilburg, The Netherlands
123
On p. 55, the efficiency rate in ‘‘Efficiency was 74.8 %, the highest value for all possible cut points’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘Efficiency was 69.2 %, the highest value for all possible cut points.’’ On p. 55, the efficiency rate in ‘‘At cut point 9, efficiency was 57.9 %’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘At cut point 9, efficiency was 59.8 %.’’ On p. 56, the efficiency rate in ‘‘Maximum specificity (78.6 %), and efficiency (74.8 %),….’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘Maximum specificity (78.6 %), and efficiency (69.2 %), …’’.
Data Loading...
