Estimating the Causal Effect of Gun Prevalence on Homicide Rates: A Local Average Treatment Effect Approach
- PDF / 808,675 Bytes
- 65 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 81 Downloads / 228 Views
Estimating the Causal Effect of Gun Prevalence on Homicide Rates: A Local Average Treatment Effect Approach Tomislav Kovandzic • Mark E. Schaffer • Gary Kleck
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012
Abstract
Objective This paper uses a ‘‘local average treatment effect’’ (LATE) framework in an attempt to disentangle the separate effects of criminal and noncriminal gun prevalence on violence rates. We first show that a number of previous studies have failed to properly address the problems of endogeneity, proxy validity, and heterogeneity in criminality. We demonstrate that the time series proxy problem is severe; previous panel data studies have used proxies that are essentially uncorrelated in time series with direct measures of gun relevance. Methods We adopt instead a cross-section approach: we use US county-level data for 1990, and we proxy gun prevalence levels by the percent of suicides committed with guns, which recent research indicates is the best measure of gun levels for crosssectional research. We instrument gun levels with three plausibly exogenous instruments: subscriptions to outdoor sports magazines, voting preferences in the 1988 Presidential election, and numbers of military veterans. In our LATE framework, the estimated
T. Kovandzic (&) Program in Criminology, University of Texas at Dallas, P.O Box 830688, GR 31, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, USA e-mail: [email protected] M. E. Schaffer Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK e-mail: [email protected] M. E. Schaffer CEPR, London, UK M. E. Schaffer IZA, Bonn, Germany G. Kleck College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1127, USA e-mail: [email protected]
123
J Quant Criminol
impact of gun prevalence is a weighted average of a possibly negative impact of noncriminal gun prevalence on homicide and a presumed positive impact of criminal gun prevalence. Results We find evidence of a significant negative impact, and interpret it as primarily ‘‘local to noncriminals’’, i.e., primarily determined by a negative deterrent effect of noncriminal gun prevalence. We also demonstrate that an ATE for gun prevalence that is positive, negative, or approximately zero are all entirely plausible and consistent with our estimates of a significant negative impact of noncriminal gun prevalence. Conclusions The policy implications of our findings are perhaps best understood in the context of two hypothetical gun ban scenarios, the first more optimistic, the second more pessimistic and realistic. First, gun prohibition might reduce gun ownership equiproportionately among criminals and noncriminals, and the traditional ATE interpretation therefore applies. Our results above suggest that plausible estimates of the causal impact of an average reduction in gun prevalence include positive, nil, and negative effects on gun homicide rates, and hence no strong evidence in favor of or against such a measure. But it is highly unlikely that criminals would comply with gun prohibition to the same extent as noncrim
Data Loading...
