Evaluation of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines
- PDF / 818,304 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 23 Downloads / 188 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Evaluation of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines Lisa Löhrs1* , Mirjam Handrack1, Ina Kopp2, Frank Jessen3, Elias Wagner1, Peter Falkai1, Astrid Röh1, Wolfgang Strube1 and Alkomiet Hasan1,4
Abstract Background: Information regarding the distribution of evidence grades in psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines is lacking. Based on the German evidence- and consensus- based (S3) psychiatry and psychotherapy and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) treatment guidelines, we aimed to specify how guideline recommendations are composed and to what extent recommendations are evidence-based. Methods: Data was collected from all published evidence- and consensus-based S3-classified psychiatry and psychotherapy guidelines. As control conditions, data from German neurology S3-classified guidelines as well as data from recent SIGN guidelines of mental health were extracted. Two investigators reviewed the selected guidelines independently, extracted and analysed the numbers and levels of recommendations. Results: On average, 45.1% of all recommendations are not based on strong scientific evidence in German guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy. A related pattern can be confirmed for SIGN guidelines, where the mean average of recommendations with lacking evidence is 33.9%. By contrast, in the German guidelines of neurology the average of such recommendations is 16.5%. A total of 24.5% of all recommendations in the guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy are classified as level A recommendations, compared to 31.6% in the field of neurology and 31.1% in the SIGN guidelines. Related patterns were observed for B and 0 level recommendations. Conclusion: Guidelines should be practical tools to simplify the decision-making process based on scientific evidence. Up to 45% of all recommendations in the investigated guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy are not based on strong scientific evidence. The reasons for this high number remain unclear. Possibly, only a limited number of studies answer clinically relevant questions. Our findings thereby question whether guidelines should include non-evidence-based recommendations to be methodologically stringent and whether specific processes to develop expert-opinion statements must be implemented. Keywords: German guidelines of psychiatry and psychotherapy, SIGN guidelines, Rrecommendations, Evidence grade, Distribution of recommendations
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336 München, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a
Data Loading...
