Exploration of the acceptability and usability of advance care planning tools in long term care homes

  • PDF / 676,130 Bytes
  • 13 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 37 Downloads / 204 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Exploration of the acceptability and usability of advance care planning tools in long term care homes Tamara Sussman1* , Sharon Kaasalainen2 , Rennie Bimman1, Harveer Punia2 , Nathaniel Edsell1 and Jess Sussman3

Abstract Objectives: Despite known benefits, advance care planning (ACP) is rarely a component of usual practice in longterm care (LTC). A series of tools and workbooks have been developed to support ACP uptake amongst the generable population. Yet, their potential for improving ACP uptake in LTC has yet to be examined. This study explored if available ACP tools are acceptable for use in LTC by (a) eliciting staff views on the content and format that would support ACP tool usability in LTC (b) examining if publicly available ACP tools include content identified as relevant by LTC home staff. Ultimately this study aimed to identify the potential for existing ACP tools to improve ACP engagement in LTC. Methods: A combination of focus group deliberations with LTC home staff (N = 32) and content analysis of publicly available ACP tools (N = 32) were used to meet the study aims. Results: Focus group deliberations suggested that publicly available ACP tools may be acceptable for use in LTC if the tools include psychosocial elements and paper-based versions exist. Content analysis of available paper-based tools revealed that only a handful of ACP tools (32/611, 5%) include psychosocial content, with most encouraging psychosocially-oriented reflections (30/32, 84%), and far fewer providing direction around other elements of ACP such as communicating psychosocial preferences (14/32, 44%) or transforming preferences into a documented plan (7/32, 22%). Conclusions: ACP tools that include psychosocial content may improve ACP uptake in LTC because they elicit future care issues considered pertinent and can be supported by a range of clinical and non-clinical staff. To increase usability and engagement ACP tools may require infusion of scenarios pertinent to frail older persons, and a better balance between psychosocial content that elicits reflections and psychosocial content that supports communication. Keywords: End-of-life communication, Death and dying, Assisted living, Palliative care, Advance directive, Nursing homes

* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 McGill University School of Social Work, 3506 Rue University #300, Montréal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material