Foreign Direct Investment. Six Country Case Studies
- PDF / 53,309 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 441 x 666 pts Page_size
- 106 Downloads / 295 Views
www.palgrave-journals.com/ces
Book Review Foreign Direct Investment. Six Country Case Studies YA Wei and VN Balasubramanyam (eds) Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2004, 204pp. Comparative Economic Studies (2007) 49, 470–472. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100203
This book contains six papers on foreign direct investment (FDI) in Ireland, China, India, Malaysia, Mexico, and Sub-Saharan Africa, originally presented at a conference in September 2002. The authors examine the determinants of FDI and its impact on economic development, employment, technology transfers, and trade. Every chapter is followed by very challenging comments from discussants. Frances Ruan describes the exceptionally successful experience of Ireland. Because of data limitations, her discussion of FDI impact centres on manufacturing sector. Can Irish industrial policies be copied successfully elsewhere? Commentator Peter Buckley summarises key elements behind Irish success with attracting FDI: a favourable institutional environment, consistency of policy, openness, focus on the regional (EU) market, and attention to comparative advantage, as determined by MNC’s, not the government. Yingqi Annie Wei analyses FDI in China. Why is China so successful in attracting FDI? After discussing national versus regional aspects that affect Chinese FDI inflows, she argues for transaction costs and domestic financing constraints as the primary explanations for high FDI inflows. But the distribution of FDI across regions and sectors is pretty uneven. With regard to relationship between FDI and technology spillovers, trade, and economic growth, Wei observes that evidence is very mixed. More rigorous empirical analyses as well as theoretical models designed specifically for China would be useful, in addition to using firm-level data, as suggested by a discussant, Yasheng Huang. A second paper by V.N. Balasubramanyam and Vidya Mahambare discusses FDI in India. Why has the liberalisation in 1991 failed to attract more FDI? Comparing India and China, the authors provide several reasons why Chinese success with FDI inflows might not be a proper model for India. They argue that factor and product market distortions generated by the overall domestic policies – for example, excessive delay and red tape – are the major reasons for relatively low FDI inflows. These domestic market
Book Review
471
distortions should be eliminated first, because without major adjustments in domestic policy, opening the doors widely to FDI will not be very successful. Discussant Sanjaya Lall, however, warns that a desire to attract more FDI does not mean that India should adopt completely ‘distortion free’ policy. Nigel Driffield, Roger Clarke, and Abdul Halim Mohd Noor discuss FDI in Malaysia during four industrialisation stages. They describe the role of FDI in Malaysian electrical and electronics industry, particularly its impact on technological development. Although Malaysia has managed to attract huge amounts of FDI, discriminatory government policies seem to limit spillovers to domestic fir
Data Loading...
