FTC v. Google: The Enforcement of Antitrust Law in Online Markets
In January 2013, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finally closed its investigation against Google based on Section 5 FTC Act. The inquiry was mainly related to “search bias” allegations and Google’s “multihoming policy”. This article will focus on
- PDF / 1,192,394 Bytes
- 113 Pages / 439.42 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 99 Downloads / 200 Views
Gintarė Surblytė Editor
Competition on the Internet
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
For further volumes/weitere Ba¨nde: http://www.springer.com/series/7760
MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law Volume 23
Edited by Josef Drexl Reto M. Hilty Joseph Straus
Gintare˙ Surblyte˙ Editor
Competition on the Internet
Editor Gintare˙ Surblyte˙ Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Munich Germany
ISSN 2191-5822 ISSN 2191-5830 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-642-55095-9 ISBN 978-3-642-55096-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-55096-6 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014949202 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)
Contents
Introductory Remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gintare˙ Surblyte˙
1
Selective Distribution and the Internet: Lessons from Case C-439/09 Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosme´tique (13 October 2011) . . . . . . . . . Stefan Enchelmaier
5
Internet Competition and E-Books: Challenging the Competition Policy Acquis? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simonetta Vezzoso
25
A Note on Price-Parity Clauses in Platform Mar
Data Loading...
