Implementing stratified care for acute low back pain in primary care using the STarT Back instrument: a process evaluati
- PDF / 1,140,535 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 99 Downloads / 189 Views
(2020) 21:776
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Implementing stratified care for acute low back pain in primary care using the STarT Back instrument: a process evaluation within the context of a large pragmatic cluster randomized trial Addie Middleton1* , G. Kelley Fitzgerald2, Anthony Delitto3, Robert B. Saper4, Katherine Gergen Barnett4 and Joel Stevans2,5
Abstract Background: Although risk-stratifying patients with acute lower back pain is a promising approach for improving long-term outcomes, efforts to implement stratified care in the US healthcare system have had limited success. The objectives of this process evaluation were to 1) examine variation in two essential processes, risk stratification of patients with low back pain and referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy and 2) identify barriers and facilitators related to the risk stratification and referral processes. Methods: We used a sequential mixed methods study design to evaluate implementation of stratified care at 33 primary care clinics (17 intervention, 16 control) participating in a larger pragmatic trial. We used electronic health record data to calculate: 1) clinic-level risk stratification rates (proportion of patients with back pain seen in the clinic over the study period who completed risk stratification questionnaires), 2) rates of risk stratification across different points in the clinical workflow (front desk, rooming, and time with clinician), and 3) rates of referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy among intervention clinics. We purposively sampled 13 clinics for onsite observations, which occurred in month 24 of the 26-month study. Results: The overall risk stratification rate across the 33 clinics was 37.8% (range: 14.7–64.7%). Rates were highest when patients were identified as having back pain by front desk staff (overall: 91.9%, range: 80.6–100%). Rates decreased as the patient moved further into the visit (rooming, 29.3% [range: 0–83.3%]; and time with clinician, 11.3% [range: 0–49.3%]. The overall rate of referrals of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy across the 17 intervention clinics was 42.1% (range: 8.3–70.8%). Barriers included staffs’ knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, patients’ needs, technology issues, lack of physician engagement, and lack of time. Adaptability of the processes was a facilitator. (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130-4817, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons li
Data Loading...
