Improved performance of ERA5 in global tropospheric delay retrieval

  • PDF / 12,163,209 Bytes
  • 14 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 15 Downloads / 169 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Improved performance of ERA5 in global tropospheric delay retrieval Yaozong Zhou1 · Yidong Lou1,2 · Weixing Zhang1 · Cuilin Kuang3 · Wenxun Liu1 · Jingna Bai1 Received: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Reanalysis products have played an important role in space geodetic tropospheric delay retrieval and modeling in the past two decades. As the release of the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA5), with improved temporal-spatial resolutions compared to its predecessor, ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERAI), the performance of ERA5 in tropospheric delay retrieval was comprehensively investigated in this study. Hourly tropospheric delays in zenith and 5° elevation directions at 312 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations covering the year of 2018 from ERA5 and ERAI were ray-traced. Taking IGS Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) as reference, the reanalysis-derived ZTDs were evaluated in annual, seasonal and diurnal scales, and superior performances of ERA5 ZTD to ERAI ZTD in all scales were revealed, with bias, Root Mean Square (RMS) and standard deviation of 1.6, 11.0 and 10.1 mm for ERA5, and of 3.1, 13.8 and 12.6 mm for ERAI, respectively. Due to the absence of reliable Slant Path Delay (SPD) references, the SPDs as well as the mapping factors derived from ERA5 and ERAI were directly compared and converted to equivalent station height errors at these stations. Obvious differences were also found for SPDs and mapping factors, especially for the wet component, with slant wet delay and wet mapping factor difference RMSs of 51.9 mm and 146.1 × 10−3 , respectively, corresponding to equivalent station height RMSs of about 10.4 mm. Tropospheric delays and models (e.g., mapping functions) derived from ERA5, with improved performance and temporal resolution (e.g., to support potential tropospheric parameter diurnal variation study), therefore can be expected for space geodetic applications. Keywords ERA5 · ERA-interim · Ray-tracing · Space geodesy · Tropospheric delay retrieval

1 Introduction As one major error source in space geodetic techniques, such as Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) (Hofmeister and Böhm 2017), Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) (Hobiger et al. 2008a), Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) (Kinoshita et al. 2013) and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) (Mendes et al. 2002), the tropospheric delay requires careful treatments. There are mainly two methods to account for the tropospheric delay along

B B

Yidong Lou [email protected] Weixing Zhang [email protected]

1

GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

2

State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

3

School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, China

the geodetic signal. One is to calculate the Slant Path Delay (SPD) directly by using ray-tracing techniques (e.g.