Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study

  • PDF / 1,103,768 Bytes
  • 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 98 Downloads / 192 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study Carmelo Messina 1,2 Alessandro Poloni3 Vito Chianca4 Domenico Albano5 Luca Petruccio Piodi6 Fabio Massimo Ulivieri7 Luca Maria Sconfienza1,2 ●











1234567890();,:

1234567890();,:

Received: 22 February 2018 / Accepted: 3 June 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Abstract Purpose Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) provides an indirect score of trabecular microarchitecture from lumbar spine (LS) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Increasing soft tissue thickness artifactually reduces TBS values; we evaluated the effect of a fictitious increase of soft tissue thickness on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) reproducibility on a phantom model. Methods A Hologic spine phantom was scanned with a QDR-Discovery W Hologic densitometer. Fresh pork rind layers of 5 mm were used to simulate the in-vivo soft tissues. For each scan mode (fast array [FA], array, high definition [HD]), 25 scans were consecutively performed without phantom repositioning, at 0 (no layers), 1 cm, 3 cm, and 6 cm of thickness. BMD and TBS reproducibility was calculated as the complement to 100% of least significant change. Results Both BMD and TBS reproducibility slightly decreased with increasing soft tissue; this difference was statistically significant only for BMD using HD modality (reproducibility decreased from 99.4% at baseline to 98.4% at 6-cm of thickness). TBS reproducibility was slightly lower compared to that of BMD, and ranged between 98.8% (array, 0 cm) and 97.4% (FA, 6 cm). Without taking into account manufacturer BMI optimization, we found a progressive decrease of TBS mean values with increasing soft tissue thickness. The highest TBS difference between baseline scan and 6 cm was −0.179 (−14.27%) using HD. Conclusions Despite being slightly lower than that of BMD, TBS reproducibility was not affected up to 6 cm of increasing soft tissue thickness, and was even less influenced by fat than BMD reproducibility. Keywords Trabecular bone score Reproducibility Precision Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Phantom ●







Introduction * Carmelo Messina [email protected] 1

Unità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy

2

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

3

Reparto di Radiologia, ASST Bergamo Est Ospedale Bolognini, Via Paderno 21, 24068 Seriate, Italy

4

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università Federico II, Via Panzini 5, Napoli, Italy

5

Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Di.Bi.Med., Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, Italy

6

Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

7

Bone Metabolic Unit, Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is a textural