Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal c

  • PDF / 564,797 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 71 Downloads / 173 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


and Other Interventional Techniques

Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review Osayande Osagiede1 · Daniela A. Haehn2 · Aaron C. Spaulding3,4   · Nolan Otto3,4 · Jordan J. Cochuyt3 · Riccardo Lemini4,5 · Amit Merchea5 · Scott Kelley6 · Dorin T. Colibaseanu4,5 Received: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 September 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Background  Utilization of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has multiple determinants, one being the specialization of the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in the utilization of MIS, associated length of stay (LOS), and complications for colorectal cancer between colorectal (CRS) and general surgeons (GS). Previous studies have documented the influence of surgical volume and surgeon specialty on clinical outcomes and patient survival following colorectal cancer surgery. It is unclear whether there are differences in the utilization of MIS for colorectal cancer based on surgeon’s specialization and how this influences clinical outcomes. Methods  Using the 2013–2015 Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset and the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System, colorectal cancer patients experiencing a colorectal surgery were identified as well as the operating physician’s specialty. Mixed-effects regression models were used to identify associations between the use of MIS, complications during the hospital stay, and patient LOS with patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. Results  There is no difference in the use of MIS, complication, nor LOS between GS and CRS for colorectal cancer surgery. However, physician volume was associated with increased use of MIS (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09, 1.46) and MIS was associated with decreases in certain complications as well as reductions in LOS overall (β = − 0.16, p