Kinematic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: no difference in frequency of arthroscopic lysis of adhes
- PDF / 529,099 Bytes
- 6 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 42 Downloads / 169 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Kinematic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: no difference in frequency of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for arthrofibrosis Seth Stake1 · Safa Fassihi1 · Casey Gioia1 · Alex Gu1 · Amil Agarwal1 · Alex Akman2 · Andrew Sparks1 · Evan Argintar2 Received: 5 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020 © Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Arthrofibrosis is a condition that can cause excessive scar tissue formation, leading to painful restriction of joint motion. Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), significant arthrofibrosis can result in permanent deficits in range of motion (ROM) if not treated. Although arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (ALOA) reliably improves post-TKA ROM if performed in a timely fashion, it exposes patients to additional anesthesia, heightens the risk of infection, and increases overall medical expenses. Kinematically aligned TKA has emerged as an alternative method to mechanically aligned, basing bony cuts off of the patient’s pre-arthritic anatomy while limiting need for soft tissue and ligamentous releases. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in the frequency of post-TKA arthrofibrosis requiring ALOA between kinematic and mechanically aligned TKA. Between 2012 and 2019, a retrospective analysis was conducted based on a single surgeon’s experience. Two cohorts were made based on alignment technique. Postoperatively, patients were diagnosed with arthrofibrosis and indicated for ALOA if they had functional pain with
Data Loading...
