Language proficiency, sociolinguistic factors and inhibitory control among bilinguals

  • PDF / 608,073 Bytes
  • 25 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
  • 56 Downloads / 240 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(0123456789().,-volV) ( 01234567 89().,-volV)

RESEARCH PAPER

Language proficiency, sociolinguistic factors and inhibitory control among bilinguals Nithin Thanissery . Priyanka Parihar . Bhoomika Rastogi Kar

Received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 17 August 2020 Ó Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Abstract Bilingualism interacts with cognitive control mechanisms, particularly inhibitory control. It is believed that language proficiency as a measure of the degree of bilingualism may influence inhibitory control. However, this interaction is modulated by sociolinguistic factors associated with bilingual experience. We examined the relationship between language proficiency and inhibitory control and the influence of sociolinguistic factors by comparing high and low proficient Hindi–English bilinguals, and by using a correlational design. A standard go/no-go task with varying proportions of go and no-go trials was used. Study-1 showed that age of acquisition, language use in formal/informal setting, and bilingual switching influenced the interaction between L2 proficiency and inhibitory control. In general, high proficient bilinguals were better at regulating inhibitory control when the demand on inhibition was high compared to that of low proficient bilinguals. Study-2 showed that contextual switching and setting-based use of L2 predicted inhibitory control in a high monitoring condition while use of L1 predicted inhibitory control irrespective of inhibitory demands. However, contextual switching strengthened the interaction between L2 proficiency and inhibitory control whereas use of L1 moderated the relationship between L1 proficiency N. Thanissery  P. Parihar  B. R. Kar (&) Centre of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India e-mail: [email protected]

and inhibitory control. We did not find a significant effect of non-language variables such as fluid intelligence, socioeconomic status, and participation in skilled activities on the relationship between language proficiency and inhibitory control. We emphasize on the role of both L1 and L2 proficiency and the use of a correlational design to investigate the relationship between bilingualism and inhibitory control. Keywords Bilingualism  Inhibitory control  Domain general cognitive control  L1/L2 proficiency  Language use  Socio-linguistic factors

Introduction The cognitive consequences of bilingualism pertaining to enhanced domain general cognitive control are related to multiple factors such as language control, maintaining and shifting between languages, proficiency, contextual use, age of acquisition, and executive functions. Most of the evidence is based on the comparisons of bilinguals and monolinguals on executive function tasks with few studies comparing high and low proficient bilinguals (Singh and Mishra 2012; Singh and Kar 2018), high switchers vs low switchers (Festman et al. 2010), and balanced vs unbalanced bilinguals (Rosselli et al. 2016; Xie 2018). The difference between biling