Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology
- PDF / 4,908,188 Bytes
- 16 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 82 Downloads / 178 Views
Open Access
RESEARCH
Missing lateral relationships in top‑level concepts of an ontology Ling Zheng1* , Yan Chen2, Hua Min3, P. Lloyd Hildebrand4, Hao Liu5, Michael Halper6, James Geller5, Sherri de Coronado7 and Yehoshua Perl5
Abstract Background: Ontologies house various kinds of domain knowledge in formal structures, primarily in the form of concepts and the associative relationships between them. Ontologies have become integral components of many health information processing environments. Hence, quality assurance of the conceptual content of any ontology is critical. Relationships are foundational to the definition of concepts. Missing relationship errors (i.e., unintended omissions of important definitional relationships) can have a deleterious effect on the quality of an ontology. An abstraction network is a structure that overlays an ontology and provides an alternate, summarization view of its contents. One kind of abstraction network is called an area taxonomy, and a variation of it is called a subtaxonomy. A methodology based on these taxonomies for more readily finding missing relationship errors is explored. Methods: The area taxonomy and the subtaxonomy are deployed to help reveal concepts that have a high likelihood of exhibiting missing relationship errors. A specific top-level grouping unit found within the area taxonomy and subtaxonomy, when deemed to be anomalous, is used as an indicator that missing relationship errors are likely to be found among certain concepts. Two hypotheses pertaining to the effectiveness of our Quality Assurance approach are studied. Results: Our Quality Assurance methodology was applied to the Biological Process hierarchy of the National Cancer Institute thesaurus (NCIt) and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy within its Clinical finding hierarchy. Many missing relationship errors were discovered and confirmed in our analysis. For both test-bed hierarchies, our Quality Assurance methodology yielded a statistically significantly higher number of concepts with missing relationship errors in comparison to a control sample of concepts. Two hypotheses are confirmed by these findings. Conclusions: Quality assurance is a critical part of an ontology’s lifecycle, and automated or semi-automated tools for supporting this process are invaluable. We introduced a Quality Assurance methodology targeted at missing relationship errors. Its successful application to the NCIt’s Biological Process hierarchy and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy indicates that it can be a useful addition to the arsenal of tools available to ontology maintenance personnel. Keywords: Ontology quality assurance, Ontology modeling, Missing relationship error, Omission error, Error concentration, Abstraction network, Taxonomy, National Cancer Institute thesaurus (NCIt), SNOMED CT
*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Computer Science and Software Engineering Department, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ 07764, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the a
Data Loading...
