Multi-Element Mercuric Iodide Detector Systems for X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Imaging

  • PDF / 2,915,567 Bytes
  • 12 Pages / 414.72 x 648 pts Page_size
  • 96 Downloads / 212 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


MULTI-ELEMENT MERCURIC IODIDE DETECTOR SYSTEMS FOR X-RAY AND GAMMA-RAY IMAGING BRADLEY E. PATT' Xsirius, Inc., 4640

Admiralty

Way,

Suite

214,

Marina

del

Rey,

CA

90292

ABSTRACT The advancement of room-temperature mercuric iodide detector technology to the point of spectroscopy-grade energy resolution coupled with the advancement in long-term stability and the high efficiency of these detectors now make it's use in large scale array systems for x- and gamma-ray imaging applications viable. Camera design criterion differ depending upon the application. A HgI2 gamma-ray camera developed at EG&G Energy Measurements has been used for imaging with various apertures, and the energy dispersive imaging aspects have been examined. Concepts for applications such as medical diagnostic imaging and a satellite based telescopes for x- and gamma-ray mapping have been objectified. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND The area of x-ray and gamma-ray imaging has diverse applications including medical diagnostic imaging systems such as those used in x-ray radiography, x-ray computed tomography (CT), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, x-ray and gamma-ray imaging systems are used in astronomy and astrophysics for mapping x-ray and gamma ray fields. Areas of current interest include solar-flare imaging, x-ray sky surveys, and surveys of various galactic regions from satellite borne instruments. Many types of image receptors are used or have been considered for modem x-ray and gamma-ray imaging systems. These include direct-exposure x-ray film, image plates, image intensifiers, gas-filled ionization chambers, scintillation detector systems, high purity germanium, and Si[Li] systems. The absorption efficiency, spatial resolution, energy resolution, and cooling requirements are compared in Table I. Table I: Comparison of the absorption efficiency, spatial resolution, energy resolution, and cooling requirements for candidate technologies for x-ray and gamma ray imaging. XR Film

Image Plates

Image Intens.

Ion. Chamb.

Scint.

Ave

Good

Poor

Good

Higi 2 / CdTe

HpGe

Si[Li]

Good

Poor

Good

Absorb. Effic.

Poor

Spatial Res.

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Energy Res.

None

None

None

Poor

Poor

Good

Good

Good

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Cry. Cooling Req'd

I

I

Author performed part of this work while at EG&G Energy Measurements, 130 Robin Hill Rd., Goleta CA 93117. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 302. @1993 Materials Research Society

44

From the comparison in Table I we see that only materials such as mercuric iodide (HgI2) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) offer the possibility of good absorption efficiency, spatial resolution, and energy resolution without the need for cryogenic cooling. Scintillation detector systems, mainly NaI(TI) scintillators coupled to photomultiplier tubes (PMT's) have been the dominant technology for over 30 years. These systems have moderate energy and spatial resolution capability. The primary instrument based o