Nervous Norms
Should we think that ‘more facts’ entails ‘better morality’? We do think this way for a great number of contemporary moral issues. After all, forming a moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to must
- PDF / 2,491,469 Bytes
- 221 Pages / 439.42 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 78 Downloads / 219 Views
Geoffrey S. Holtzman Elisabeth Hildt Editors
Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?
The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology Volume 22
Series Editors Bert Gordijn, Ethics Institute, Dublin City University, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Sabine Roeser, Philosophy Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Editorial Board Dieter Birnbacher, Institute of Philosophy, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany Roger Brownsword, Law, Kings College London, London, UK Ruth Chadwick, ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspe, Cardiff, UK Paul Stephen Dempsey, University of Montreal, Institute of Air & Space Law, Montreal, Canada Michael Froomkin, Miami Law, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA Serge Gutwirth, Campus Etterbeek, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Elsene, Belgium Henk Ten Have, Center for Healthcare Ethics, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Søren Holm, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK George Khushf, Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, SC, USA Justice Michael Kirby, High Court of Australia, Kingston, Australia Bartha Knoppers, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada David Krieger, The Waging Peace Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Graeme Laurie, AHRC Centre for Intellectual Property and Technology Law, Edinburgh, UK René Oosterlinck, European Space Agency, Paris, France John Weckert, Charles Sturt University, North Wagga Wagga, Australia
Technologies are developing faster and their impact is bigger than ever before. Synergies emerge between formerly independent technologies that trigger accelerated and unpredicted effects. Alongside these technological advances new ethical ideas and powerful moral ideologies have appeared which force us to consider the application of these emerging technologies. In attempting to navigate utopian and dystopian visions of the future, it becomes clear that technological progress and its moral quandaries call for new policies and legislative responses. Against this backdrop, this book series from Springer provides a forum for interdisciplinary discussion and normative analysis of emerging technologies that are likely to have a significant impact on the environment, society and/or humanity. These will include, but be no means limited to nanotechnology, neurotechnology, information technology, biotechnology, weapons and security technology, energy technology, and space-based technologies. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7761
Geoffrey S. Holtzman • Elisabeth Hildt Editors
Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?
Editors Geoffrey S. Holtzman New York, NY, USA
Elisabeth Hildt Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago, IL, USA
ISSN 1875-0044 ISSN 1875-0036 (electronic) The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ISBN 978-3-030-56133-8 ISBN 978-3-030-56134-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.100
Data Loading...
