Neural correlates of derived relational responding on tests of stimulus equivalence
- PDF / 1,130,557 Bytes
- 8 Pages / 610 x 792 pts Page_size
- 99 Downloads / 149 Views
BioMed Central
Open Access
Research
Neural correlates of derived relational responding on tests of stimulus equivalence Michael W Schlund*1,2, Michael F Cataldo1,2 and Rudolf Hoehn-Saric2 Address: 1Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore MD, USA and 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA Email: Michael W Schlund* - [email protected]; Michael F Cataldo - [email protected]; Rudolf HoehnSaric - [email protected] * Corresponding author
Published: 1 February 2008 Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:6
doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-6
Received: 23 April 2007 Accepted: 1 February 2008
This article is available from: http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/6 © 2008 Schlund et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract Background: An essential component of cognition and language involves the formation of new conditional relations between stimuli based upon prior experiences. Results of investigations on transitive inference (TI) highlight a prominent role for the medial temporal lobe in maintaining associative relations among sequentially arranged stimuli (A > B > C > D > E). In this investigation, medial temporal lobe activity was assessed while subjects completed "Stimulus Equivalence" (SE) tests that required deriving conditional relations among stimuli within a class (A ≡ B ≡ C). Methods: Stimuli consisted of six consonant-vowel-consonant triads divided into two classes (A1, B1, C1; A2, B2, C2). A simultaneous matching-to-sample task and differential reinforcement were employed during pretraining to establish the conditional relations A1:B1 and B1:C1 in class 1 and A2:B2 and B2:C2 in class 2. During functional neuroimaging, recombined stimulus pairs were presented and subjects judged (yes/no) whether stimuli were related. SE tests involved presenting three different types of within-class pairs: Symmetrical (B1 A1; C1 B1; B2 A2; C2 B2), and Transitive (A1 C1; A2 C2) and Equivalence (C1 A1; C2 A2) relations separated by a nodal stimulus. Crossclass 'Foils' consisting of unrelated stimuli (e.g., A1 C2) were also presented. Results: Relative to cross-class Foils, Transitive and Equivalence relations requiring inferential judgments elicited bilateral activation in the anterior hippocampus while Symmetrical relations elicited activation in the parahippocampus. Relative to each derived relation, Foils generally elicited bilateral activation in the parahippocampus, as well as in frontal and parietal lobe regions. Conclusion: Activation observed in the hippocampus to nodal-dependent derived conditional relations (Transitive and Equivalence relations) highlights its involvement in maintaining relational structure and
Data Loading...
