Non-invasive assessment of central venous pressure in heart failure: a systematic prospective comparison of echocardiogr

  • PDF / 1,350,079 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 38 Downloads / 148 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL PAPER

Non‑invasive assessment of central venous pressure in heart failure: a systematic prospective comparison of echocardiography and Swan‑Ganz catheter Tobias Szymczyk1 · Odile Sauzet2 · Lech J. Paluszkiewicz3 · Angelika Costard‑Jäckle3,4 · Max Potratz1 · Volker Rudolph1 · Jan F. Gummert3 · Henrik Fox3,4 Received: 19 December 2019 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Assessing hemodynamics, especially central venous pressure (CVP), is essential in heart failure (HF). Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold-standard, but non-invasive methods are also needed. However, the role of 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) remains uncertain, and 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is not always available. This study investigated standardized and breathing-corrected assessment of inferior vena cava (IVC) volume using echocardiography (2DE and 3DE) versus CVP determined invasively using RHC. Sixty consecutive HF patients were included (82% male, age 54 ± 11 years, New York Heart Association class 2.23 ± 0.8, ejection fraction 46 ± 18.4%, brain natriuretic peptide 696.93 ± 773.53 pg/mL). All patients underwent Swan-Ganz RHC followed by 2DE and 3DE, and IVC volume assessment. On 2DE, mean IVC size was 18.3 ± 5.5 mm and 13.8 ± 6 mm in the largest deflection and shortest distention, respectively. Mean CVP from RHC was 9.3 ± 5.3 mmHg. Neither 2DE nor 3DE showed acceptable correlation with invasively measured CVP; IVC volume acquisition showed optimal correlation with RHC CVP (0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.77), with better correlation when mitral valve early diastole E wave and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter were added. Using a CVP cut-point of 10 mmHg, receiver operating characteristic curve showed true positivity (specificity) of 0.90 and sensitivity of 62% for predicting CVP. A validation study confirmed these findings and verified the high predictive value of IVC volume assessment. Neither 2DE nor 3DE alone can reliably mirror CVP, but IVC volume acquisition using echocardiography allows non-invasive and adequate approximation of CVP. Correlation with invasively measured pressure was strongest when CVP is > 10 mmHg. Keywords  Heart failure · Inferior vena cava · Echocardiography · Central venous pressure · Right-heart catheterization

Introduction

* Henrik Fox akleemeyer@hdz‑nrw.de 1



Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

2



Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health and Statistical Consulting Centre, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

3

Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany

4

Heart Failure Department, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany





Heart failure (HF) prevalence is increasing, with a progressive disease course, poor prognosis and impaired quality of life [