Non-invasive assessment of cirrhosis using multiphasic dual-energy CT iodine maps: correlation with model for end-stage

  • PDF / 1,073,499 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 8 Downloads / 141 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


HEPATOBILIARY

Non‑invasive assessment of cirrhosis using multiphasic dual‑energy CT iodine maps: correlation with model for end‑stage liver disease score Domenico Mastrodicasa1   · Martin J. Willemink1   · Celina Duran2 · Andrea Delli Pizzi3   · Virginia Hinostroza1   · Lior Molvin1 · Mohamed Khalaf1 · R. Brooke Jeffrey1 · Bhavik N. Patel1  Received: 22 August 2020 / Revised: 29 October 2020 / Accepted: 5 November 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Purpose  To determine whether multiphasic dual­energy (DE) CT iodine quantitation correlates with the severity of chronic liver disease. Methods  We retrospectively included 40 cirrhotic and 28 non-cirrhotic patients who underwent a multiphasic liver protocol DECT. All three phases (arterial, portal venous (PVP), and equilibrium) were performed in DE mode. Iodine (I) values (mg I/ml) were obtained by placing regions of interest in the liver, aorta, common hepatic artery, and portal vein (PV). Iodine slopes (λ) were calculated as follows: (Iequilibrium–Iarterial)/time and (Iequilibrium–IPVP)/time. Spearman correlations between λ and MELD scores were evaluated, and the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was calculated to distinguish cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Results  Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients had significantly different λequilibrium-arterial [IQR] for the caudate (λ = 2.08 [1.39–2.98] vs 1.46 [0.76–1.93], P = 0.007), left (λ = 2.05 [1.50–2.76] vs 1.51 [0.59–1.90], P = 0.002) and right lobes (λ = 1.72 [1.12–2.50] vs 1.13 [0.41–0.43], P = 0.003) and for the PV (λ = 3.15 [2.20–5.00] vs 2.29 [0.85–2.71], P = 0.001). λequilibrium-PVP were significantly different for the right (λ = 0.11 [− 0.45–1.03] vs − 0.44 [− 0.83–0.12], P = 0.045) and left lobe (λ = 0.30 [− 0.25–0.98] vs − 0.10 [− 0.35–0.24], P = 0.001). Significant positive correlations were found between MELD scores and λequilibrium-arterial for the caudate lobe (ρ = 0.34, P = 0.004) and λequilibrium-PVP for the caudate (ρ = 0.26, P = 0.028) and right lobe (ρ = 0.33, P = 0.007). AUROC in distinguishing cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients were 0.72 (P = 0.002), 0.71 (P = 0.003), and 0.75 (P = 0.001) using λequilibrium-arterial for the left lobe, right lobe, and PV, respectively. The λequilibrium-PVP AUROC of the right lobe was 0.73 (P = 0.001). Conclusion  Multiphasic DECT iodine quantitation over time is significantly different between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, correlates with the MELD score, and it could potentially serve as a non-invasive measure of cirrhosis and disease severity with acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Keywords  Dual-energy CT · Liver cirrhosis · Iodine concentration · Material decomposition · Chronic liver disease

Introduction Liver disease is responsible for over 2 million deaths/year worldwide, and complications from cirrhosis account for about a half of these [1, 2]. Currently, liver biopsy is considered the reference standard for detection and grading of fibrosis [3, 4]. However, l