Optimizing diastolic pressure gradient assessment

  • PDF / 1,650,235 Bytes
  • 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 72 Downloads / 207 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL PAPER

Optimizing diastolic pressure gradient assessment Aristomenis Manouras1,3 · Jonas Johnson2 · Lars H Lund1,3 · Anikó Ilona Nagy1,4  Received: 13 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 March 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Aims  The diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) has been proposed as a marker pulmonary vascular disease in the setting of left heart failure (HF). However, its diagnostic utility is compromised by the high prevalence of physiologically incompatible negative values (­ DPGNEG) and the contradictory evidence on its prognostic value. Pressure pulsatility impacts on DPG measurements, thus conceivably, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) measurements insusceptible to the oscillatory effect of the V-wave might yield a more reliable DPG assessment. We set out to investigate how the instantaneous PAWP at the trough of the Y-descent ­(PAWPY) influences the prevalence of ­DPGNEG and the prognostic value of the resultant ­DPGY. Methods  Hundred and fifty-three consecutive HF patients referred for right heart catheterisation were enrolled prospectively. DPG, as currently recommended, was calculated. Subsequently, P ­ AWPY was measured and the corresponding ­DPGY was calculated. Results DPGY yielded higher values (median, IQR: 3.2, 0.6–5.7 mmHg) than DPG (median, IQR: 0.9, − 1.7–3.8 mmHg); p