Orthopaedic Surgery during COVID pandemic and consequent Changes in our professional environment
- PDF / 154,904 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 52 Downloads / 179 Views
EDITORIAL
Orthopaedic Surgery during COVID pandemic and consequent Changes in our professional environment Marius M. Scarlat 1,2 & Andreas F. Mavrogenis 3
# SICOT aisbl 2020
The medical profession was thrilled and faced in first line the changes of the society during the coronavirus crisis and pandemic. [1,2,3,4,5,6] The world experienced stupor and slowdown of major economic activities. Political and social regulations were imposed. All medical specialties had to adapt and observations from our corresponding members and authors worldwide pointed out the changes in our ways of managing different medical conditions including emergency, trauma, transplantation [7] and tumor [8], cases that could not wait. The lockdown and changes in the workflow of medical centers created new challenges for the teams in all specialties, mainly in centers responsible for trauma or tumor and that were supposed to manage patients with unknown infection status. Anesthesiologists were at risk as they were supposed to act on the upper respiratory ways, intubate and ventilate cases with unknown viral charges. This resulted in casualties and morbidity by viral infection in several colleagues and some colleagues sadly and tragically lost their lives. The medical profession paid a high tribute to the pandemic with lethal cases and major stress exposure for the colleagues in the teams. [9,10,11] A special issue was released in August 2020 and included scientific reports from colleagues working in pandemic conditions [12] . All papers showed that the activity decreased, by one side because of the lockdown that kept industry and car traffic at the lowest rhythm but also because hospital regulations that imposed work shortages and security issues. Scheduled procedures were postponed but also "not life threatening trauma" resulting in unfair access
* Marius M. Scarlat [email protected] 1
Clinique Chirurgicale St Michel, Toulon, France
2
Group ELSAN, Paris, France
3
First Department of Orthopaedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 41 Ventouri Str., 15562 Athens, Greece
to health care in many services and finally creating secondary pathologies that ware even more difficult to treat in a later phase such as pseudarthrosis, malunions, impaired bone and joint function [13]. The decision to postpone or to treat conservatively these cases was finally the surgeon's responsibility because the real deciders, hospital administrators, health management public leaders and insurance companies were presenting the decisional process as something that was more related to a "recommendation" and that finally each health professional was free to decide on the treatment choices. This lack of precision resulted in a significant number of cases that required additional treatment, revision or reconstruction and here we could also include cases of tumor or dysplasia pathologies that were declined or postponed treatment resulting in life-threatening situations. Cases like "this patient have a severe fracture but he is virus-pos
Data Loading...
