Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization The Ro
The end of the Cold War has seen an international proliferation of parliamentary bodies of all types and at all levels. How can this process of parliamentarization be assessed and under what conditions do these institutions operate? This book explores how
- PDF / 146,049 Bytes
- 26 Pages / 595 x 842 pts (A4) Page_size
- 81 Downloads / 174 Views
Please respect intellectual property rights This material is copyright and its use is restricted by our standard site license terms and conditions (see palgraveconnect.com/pc/connect/info/terms_conditions.html). If you plan to copy, distribute or share in any format, including, for the avoidance of doubt, posting on websites, you need the express prior permission of Palgrave Macmillan. To request permission please contact [email protected].
The Role of the European Parliament in Europe’s Integration and Parliamentarization Process Olivier Costa and Nathalie Brack
Over the last 50 years, the European Union (EU) has been an incredible workshop for research. Scholars have produced numerous studies on both the European integration process and the EU. However, the main body of theoretical research has largely been focused on the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice. Indeed, the Commission, a “hybrid” institution combining agenda setting and control powers, has drawn much attention from specialists, who have seen it as the most original part of the European project. Since its creation in the 1980s, the Court has also been a focal point for researchers. The considerable impact of its initial decisions and the mysterious veil enshrouding its deliberations have literally fascinated political scientists. International Relations (IR) specialists, for their part, have been more inclined to study the Council, as the locus for the defense of national interests. Conversely, the European Parliament (EP), regarded as the most banal component of the Union’s political system, has remained rather neglected by scholars, all the more so as studies have mainly focused on its somewhat lackluster characteristics. Though there has recently been renewed interest in the activities of the EP, scholars have privileged the study of European elections,1 the analysis of how the EP exerts its powers2 and the way in which majorities and coalitions are made and unmade.3 It thus seems interesting to adopt a different approach to the EP and consider the institution as both original and surprising in the sense that it is together a representative chamber working as an administration (Commission), a partially integrated inter-governmental body (Council) or a jurisdiction (Court) at the supranational level. The EP represents a type of political organization beyond the nation-state paradigm and paves the way for the emergence of transnational polities on other continents. It challenges fundamental concepts such as representation, political legitimacy, deliberation and majoritarian rules. But it is also an amazing case of institutional dynamics. The most striking and stable trend of EU institutional development is 45
10.1057/9781137322746.0008 - The Role of the European Parliament in Europe’s Integration and Parliamentarization Process, Olivier Costa and Nathalie Brack
Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to University of Ottawa - PalgraveConnect - 2014-11-23
3
Supranational Parliaments
the continuous increase of t
Data Loading...
