Performance of Two Procedures for Assessing Discriminant Validity: Model Comparisons Versus Confidence Intervals | IBOOK.PUB

Performance of Two Procedures for Assessing Discriminant Validity: Model Comparisons Versus Confidence Intervals

Validity is widely seen as a unitary concept that involves multiple types of evidence for the proper interpretation of scale scores (e.g., Cizek 2012; Messick 1989). One kind of evidence is discriminant validity, the extent to which scores on different sc

PDF / 116,048 Bytes
1 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
102 Downloads / 199 Views

Data Loading...

Recommend Documents

Confidence Intervals

186 35 10MB

Discriminant Validity

167 6 31KB

Robust Resampling Confidence Intervals for Empirical Variograms

154 66 685KB

Confidence intervals with a priori parameter bounds

182 103 578KB

Validity of the Free Electron Model for Two-Dimensional Electrodes

145 12 1MB

The Estimation and Use of Confidence Intervals in Economic Analysis

154 75 511KB

Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Means of Normal Distributions with Unknown Coefficients of Variation

205 73 31MB

Assessing psychopathology in bariatric surgery candidates: discriminant validity of the SCL-90-R and SCL-K-9 in a large

133 71 587KB

Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between the Coefficients of Variation of Inverse Gaussian Distributions

178 33 31MB

Standardising pollen monitoring: quantifying confidence intervals for measurements of airborne pollen concentration

164 45 451KB

Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Sequences of Missing Values in Multivariate Time Series

158 3 18MB

A -Optimal Factorial Designs for Test Versus Control Comparisons

193 22 1MB