Prescribing Antiepileptics for the Elderly

  • PDF / 157,044 Bytes
  • 15 Pages / 504 x 720 pts Page_size
  • 84 Downloads / 183 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


THERAPY IN PRACTICE

© 2006 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Prescribing Antiepileptics for the Elderly Differences between Guideline Recommendations and Clinical Practice Mary Jo V. Pugh,1,2 Perry J. Foreman3,4 and Dan R. Berlowitz5,6 1 2 3 4 5 6

South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas, USA Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Affairs (ENRM VA) Medical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Contents Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 861 1. Recommendations for Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Older Patients Newly Diagnosed with Epilepsy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 863 1.1 Clinical Practice Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 1.2 Professional and Health Policy Organisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 1.3 Expert Consensus Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 2. Are Recommendations Translated into Practice? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 2.1 Nursing Homes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 2.2 Community-Dwelling Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 3. Diffusion of Innovations Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 4. Factors Associated with Slow Translation of Research into Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 4.1 Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 4.2 Dissemination of New Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 869 4.3 Availability of Opinion Leaders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 4.4 Evidence Supporting ‘Superiority’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 4.5 No