Prevalence of venous obstructions in (recurrent) venous thromboembolism: a case-control study
- PDF / 561,438 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 11 Downloads / 138 Views
RESEARCH
Open Access
Prevalence of venous obstructions in (recurrent) venous thromboembolism: a case-control study Pascale Notten1,2† , Rob H. W. Strijkers3†, Irwin Toonder3, Hugo ten Cate2,3,4 and Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek2,3,4,5*
Abstract Background: The role of venous obstructions as a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism has never been evaluated. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in prevalence of venous obstructions between patients with and without recurrent venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, its influence on the development of post-thrombotic syndrome and patient-reported quality of life was assessed. Methods: This matched nested case-control study included 32 patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism (26 recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and 6 pulmonary embolism) from an existing prospective cohort of deep-vein thrombosis patients and compared them to 24 age and sex matched deep-vein thrombosis patients without recurrent venous thromboembolism. All participants received standard post-thrombotic management and underwent an additional extensive duplex ultrasonography. Post-thrombotic syndrome was assessed by the Villaltascale and quality of life was measured using the SF36v2 and VEINES-QOL/Sym-questionnaires. Results: Venous obstruction was found in 6 patients (18.8%) with recurrent venous thromboembolism compared to 5 patients (20.8%) without recurrent venous thromboembolism (Odds ratio 0.88, 95%CI 0.23–3.30, p = 1.000). After a median follow-up of 60.0 months (IQR 41.3–103.5) the mean Villalta-score was 5.55 ± 3.02 versus 5.26 ± 2.63 (p = 0.909) and post-thrombotic syndrome developed in 20 (62.5%) versus 14 (58.3%) patients, respectively (Odds ratio 1.19, 95%CI 0.40–3.51, p = 0.752). If venous obstruction was present, it was mainly located in the common iliac vein (n = 7, 63.6%). In patients with an objectified venous obstruction the mean Villalta-score was 5.11 ± 2.80 versus 5.49 ± 2.87 in patients without venous obstruction (p = 0.639). Post-thrombotic syndrome developed in 6 (54.5%) versus 28 (62.2%) patients, respectively (Odds ratio 1.37, 95%CI 0.36–5.20, p = 0.736). No significant differences were seen regarding patient-reported quality of life between either groups. (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected] † Pascale Notten and Rob H. W. Strijkers contributed equally to this work. 2 CARIM, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands 3 Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original aut
Data Loading...
