Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stone
- PDF / 606,571 Bytes
- 6 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 84 Downloads / 170 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Real‑world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones David F. Friedlander1,2 · Aaron Brant3 · Timothy D. McClure3 · Joseph Del Pizzo3 · Molly A. Nowels3 · Quoc‑Dien Trinh1,2 · Art Sedrakyan3 · Bilal Chughtai3 Received: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 30 August 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Purpose To identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of treatment failure and perioperative complications following ureterorenoscopy versus shockwave lithotripsy. Methods The New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify 226,331 patients who underwent index ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones from 2000 to 2016. Propensity-matched generalized linear-mixed modeling was utilized to compare failure and complication rates between the two procedure groups. Results 219,383 individuals meeting inclusion criteria who underwent either ureterorenoscopy (n = 124,342) or shockwave lithotripsy (n = 95,041) in New York State between 2000 and 2016 were included in our analysis. After propensity score matching, patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy were found to have decreased odds of experiencing any type of 30-day complication (P
Data Loading...
