Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesa Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part

  • PDF / 841,074 Bytes
  • 26 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 99 Downloads / 153 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


CONSENSUS

Open Access

Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesa Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part 2: intraoperative and postoperative care Federico Piccioni1* , Andrea Droghetti2, Alessandro Bertani3, Cecilia Coccia4, Antonio Corcione5, Angelo Guido Corsico6, Roberto Crisci7, Carlo Curcio8, Carlo Del Naja9, Paolo Feltracco10, Diego Fontana11, Alessandro Gonfiotti12, Camillo Lopez13, Domenico Massullo14, Mario Nosotti15, Riccardo Ragazzi16, Marco Rispoli17, Stefano Romagnoli18,19, Raffaele Scala20, Luigia Scudeller21, Marco Taurchini9, Silvia Tognella22, Marzia Umari23, Franco Valenza1,24, Flavia Petrini25 and on behalf of AIPO, Associazione Italiana Pneumologi Ospedalieri; SIAARTI, Società Italiana di Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione Terapia Intensiva; SIC, Società Italiana di Chirurgia; SICT, Società Italiana di Chirurgia Toracica; SIET, Società Italiana di Endoscopia Toracica; SIP, Società Italiana di Pneumologia

Abstract Introduction: Anesthetic care in patients undergoing thoracic surgery presents specific challenges that require a multidisciplinary approach to management. There remains a need for standardized, evidence-based, continuously updated guidelines for perioperative care in these patients. Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group, the Perioperative Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery (PACTS) group, was established to develop recommendations for anesthesia practice in patients undergoing elective lung resection for lung cancer. The project addressed three key areas: preoperative patient assessment and preparation, intraoperative management (surgical and anesthesiologic care), and postoperative care and discharge. A series of clinical questions was developed, and literature searches were performed to inform discussions around these areas, leading to the development of 69 recommendations. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria. (Continued on next page)

* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Critical and Supportive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a c